A Lindsay Clancy copycat just murdered her 2-year-old in Illinois and then tried to kill herself.
I knew this was coming. It was only a matter of when.
This country is mentally unwell and has a sick habit of idolizing people like Luigi Mangione and now Lindsay Clancy.
This will keep happening if we refuse to hold people like Clancy accountable for murdering her three kids and instead turn her into a martyr because she was “depressed.”
Unbelievable. Makes me sick. https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2095209450219180402/video/1
NEWS: The US Marshals Service has deputized members of Elon Musk's private security detail, giving them certain rights of federal law enforcement agents. They can now be armed with weapons in fed buildings & can use deadly force & be covered by the govt.
The judge had to pull Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer Kevin Reddington aside today after he completely lost it in court.
According to reports, Reddington was told his behavior was inappropriate after he got visibly frustrated that the judge wouldn’t remove a juror. Other jurors had allegedly said that person wasn’t following the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt.
Reddington wanted the juror gone and assumed the holdout was on Lindsay’s side. The judge asked him why he’d assume that juror wasn’t against her.
Then Reddington threw the papers the judge had just handed him, slammed things on the table, huffed, and melted down in open court.
Removing a juror for not agreeing with fellow jurors is certainly jury tampering. That is pretty amazing it would be that lopsided in her favor but maybe the point of contention is whether she's insane or not?
I myself wouldn't disagree with the insanity defense, if that's on the table. It's not saying murder didn't happen or that it was someone else, as surely no one is saying that!
#11:Pinguinite
To: Esso, Pinguinite, ghostrider(#10)
Fox's reporting: "The defense points to the foreperson’s note indicating the juror had “acknowledged doubt” but was refusing to apply it to the case “as the law states.” Sullivan previously declined to further question or remove the juror, finding there was not enough evidence that the juror was refusing to follow the law.
Clancy’s attorneys now argue the dispute goes beyond a disagreement among jurors and raises questions about whether the juror is biased against people with mental illness. Clancy presented a lack-of-criminal-responsibility defense at trial, and her attorneys argue that an impartial jury is a fundamental constitutional right."
This implies that yes, 11 jurists are going with the insanity defense and one is not agreeing with insanity, which would mean that there's no dispute on her killing her kids, just a dispute on her state of mind.
I read last night that if she was/is declared not guilty by reason of insanity, the maximum she can be held in an asylum in MA is something like 60 days or six months.
I have no idea if that is true or not, somebody could've just been making that up, which is common now [and annoying AF].
I suppose it's all academic now as the emergency stay has been denied by the MA Supreme Court, and a mistrial has been declared.
My main interest in this is; Why are so many people falling into insanity? Murders, suicide-by-cop, TDS to the point where you try to assassinate people, etc.
It's doubtful me and Kim will waste much of our rare two-day weekend talking shop about it.
We believe clot-shots, DS agitprop and several other factors are involved. There not a fkn thing either one of us can do about it.
>>This implies that yes, 11 jurists are going with the insanity defense and one is not agreeing with insanity, which would mean that there's no dispute on her killing her kids, just a dispute on her state of mind.<<
Does that mean he was holding out for murder in the 1st degree, or just plain 'not guilty'? It looked pre-meditated to me, FWIW.
Well, anyhoo, he had his Henry Fonda "12 Angry Men" moment.
>>Does that mean he was holding out for murder in the 1st degree, or just plain 'not guilty'? It looked pre-meditated to me, FWIW.
Either is possible, I suppose. It's hard to imagine a full "not guilty" conclusion when there's no debate whatsoever that she did kill her children. If insanity is the agreed basis, I'm not sure how "premeditated" would make a difference.
I thought juries had the option of convicting on various degrees of murder, 1st, 2nd or 3rd. I think they do, at least in some states. Don't know the technicals though. They go with the most serious conviction that all agree on?
The hold out jurist might have considered that by holding out, he risks her going completely free with no retrial. Jurists are probably instructed not to think in those terms though.
#1: Esso To: All (#0)
I can now confirm he RECEIVED it and is taking it SERIOUSLY.
According to the FDA’s own data used for approval, we found it’s a form of HUMAN SACRIFICE to administer mFLUSIVA.
To theoretically "prevent" ONE flu hospitalization:
2 people must suffer unexplained deaths
278 people must suffer a disabling Grade 3 reaction
3,798 people must suffer an adverse event
The FDA’s approval of mFLUSIVA must be IMMEDIATELY REVERSED.
Biden’s accomplishments after nearly five decades in politics:
1973 - Biden enters politics.
1974
1975
1976
1977 - Biden fights to keep schools segregated because “allowing blacks to integrate would create a racial jungle”.
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988 - Ended presidential campaign after getting caught plagiarizing.
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994 - Writes the “Crime Bill” (we all know how that worked out)
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2008
2009
2010 - Eulogizes Robert C. Byrd. former KKK recruiter.
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016 - Called service members “stupid bastards”.
2017 - 2020 - illegally retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen.
2020 - 2023:
• Botched Afghanistan Withdrawal
• Left $80+ billion in military equipment behind for the Taliban
• Record High Spending Bills
• Energy Dependent
• Re-entered Paris Agreement
• Open borders
• Breaking record # of illegals crossing the border
• Record High Inflation
• Record High Gas Prices
• Depleted Petroleum Reserves
• $200B to Ukraine
• Classified Documents
• Cocaine in WH
• Normalizing Pedophilia
• $6B to Iran
• Most Vacations Taken
• DOJ Weaponization
Woman? His real name is Michael LaVaughn Robinson.
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 11:11:00 Reply Private Reply
#2: Esso To: ghostrider (#1)
MSM, period.
You'd think the size of the door would give you a clue.
And there it is…
A Lindsay Clancy copycat just murdered her 2-year-old in Illinois and then tried to kill herself.
I knew this was coming. It was only a matter of when.
This country is mentally unwell and has a sick habit of idolizing people like Luigi Mangione and now Lindsay Clancy.
This will keep happening if we refuse to hold people like Clancy accountable for murdering her three kids and instead turn her into a martyr because she was “depressed.”
Unbelievable. Makes me sick. https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/2095209450219180402/video/1
NEWS: The US Marshals Service has deputized members of Elon Musk's private security detail, giving them certain rights of federal law enforcement agents. They can now be armed with weapons in fed buildings & can use deadly force & be covered by the govt.
This is a great move.
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 12:33:23 Reply Private Reply
#3: Esso To: All (#2)
There's a lot of speculation that she may become the new WH press secretary.
There's also speculation that her pro-Trump politics might've ground FOX's gears.
I met her briefly once, probably in the mid-90s, when she was with CNBC.
Really pretty eyes and face, kinda thicc down below.
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/media/fox-news-maria-bartiromo-rcna595954
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 14:17:06 Reply Private Reply
#4: Esso To: All (#3)
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 15:55:39 Reply Private Reply
#5: Esso To: All (#4)
BREAKING LINDSAY CLANCY NEWS!
The judge had to pull Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer Kevin Reddington aside today after he completely lost it in court.
According to reports, Reddington was told his behavior was inappropriate after he got visibly frustrated that the judge wouldn’t remove a juror. Other jurors had allegedly said that person wasn’t following the judge’s instructions on reasonable doubt.
Reddington wanted the juror gone and assumed the holdout was on Lindsay’s side. The judge asked him why he’d assume that juror wasn’t against her.
Then Reddington threw the papers the judge had just handed him, slammed things on the table, huffed, and melted down in open court.
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 17:15:42 Reply Private Reply
#6: Esso To: All (#5)
Indiana joins FTC in suing Amazon over ‘hidden auction fees’
https://www.wane.com/news/indiana/indiana-joins-ftc-in-suing-amazon-over-hidden-auction-fees/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter_wane15
Esso posted on 2026-09-03 19:38:42 Reply Private Reply
#7: Pinguinite To: Esso (#5)
Pinguinite posted on 2026-09-04 00:56:16 Reply Private Reply
#8: ghostrider To: Esso (#3)
ghostrider posted on 2026-09-04 11:47:23 Reply Private Reply
#9: Esso To: Pinguinite (#7)
There's no way of knowing which way the lone holdout voted.
I can't imagine 11 of 12 people voting not guilty. If the country is that far gone, Bruce Willis should let the asteroid hit the Earth.
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 11:53:19 Reply Private Reply
#10: Pinguinite To: Esso (#9)
Pinguinite posted on 2026-09-04 13:43:36 Reply Private Reply
#11: Pinguinite To: Esso, Pinguinite, ghostrider (#10)
Fox's reporting: "The defense points to the foreperson’s note indicating the juror had “acknowledged doubt” but was refusing to apply it to the case “as the law states.” Sullivan previously declined to further question or remove the juror, finding there was not enough evidence that the juror was refusing to follow the law.
Clancy’s attorneys now argue the dispute goes beyond a disagreement among jurors and raises questions about whether the juror is biased against people with mental illness. Clancy presented a lack-of-criminal-responsibility defense at trial, and her attorneys argue that an impartial jury is a fundamental constitutional right."
This implies that yes, 11 jurists are going with the insanity defense and one is not agreeing with insanity, which would mean that there's no dispute on her killing her kids, just a dispute on her state of mind.
Pinguinite posted on 2026-09-04 14:45:30 Reply Private Reply
#12: Esso To: Pinguinite (#10)
My main interest in this is; Why are so many people falling into insanity? Murders, suicide-by-cop, TDS to the point where you try to assassinate people, etc.
It's doubtful me and Kim will waste much of our rare two-day weekend talking shop about it.
We believe clot-shots, DS agitprop and several other factors are involved. There not a fkn thing either one of us can do about it.
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 15:04:45 Reply Private Reply
#13: Esso To: Pinguinite (#11)
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 15:18:35 Reply Private Reply
#14: Esso To: All (#13)
"Clenching her hands into FISTS."
"One female juror would not even OPEN HER EYES."
"A female juror was pursing her lips."
"One female juror was [shaking] her head 'NO.'"
"All the jurors were extremely tense."
All that freaking energy to support a murderer...terrifying.
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 15:57:03 Reply Private Reply
#15: Pinguinite To: Esso (#13)
>>Does that mean he was holding out for murder in the 1st degree, or just plain 'not guilty'? It looked pre-meditated to me, FWIW.
Either is possible, I suppose. It's hard to imagine a full "not guilty" conclusion when there's no debate whatsoever that she did kill her children. If insanity is the agreed basis, I'm not sure how "premeditated" would make a difference.
I thought juries had the option of convicting on various degrees of murder, 1st, 2nd or 3rd. I think they do, at least in some states. Don't know the technicals though. They go with the most serious conviction that all agree on?
The hold out jurist might have considered that by holding out, he risks her going completely free with no retrial. Jurists are probably instructed not to think in those terms though.
Pinguinite posted on 2026-09-04 16:35:44 Reply Private Reply
#16: Esso To: Pinguinite (#15)
The poll showed only 3% either of the not guilty options.
Copycats already starting...
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 18:15:04 Reply Private Reply
#17: Esso To: Pinguinite (#16)
I think me and Doc might steer clear of this story to keep the peace this weekend. I might refrain from too much teasing, also.
She has precedent on her side now, and I'm a total prick.
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 18:37:42 Reply Private Reply
#18: Pinguinite To: Esso (#16)
>>I think the assumption is that if you're 'insane', you're not able to plan.
Premeditated Insanity Murder in the First Degree.... No, I don't think any state has a charge like that on the books.
Pinguinite posted on 2026-09-04 21:01:13 Reply Private Reply
#19: Esso To: Pinguinite (#18)
Esso posted on 2026-09-04 22:48:57 Reply Private Reply