Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: The Most Powerful People in America
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Apr 16, 2008
Author: Joel S. Hirschhorn
Post Date: 2008-04-16 16:17:57 by statusquobuster
Keywords: consumer power, consumer spending, economy
Views: 79
Comments: 3

The Most Powerful People in America

Joel S. Hirschhorn

They are not the rich and superrich, nor the politically powerful running the two-party plutocracy, nor the greedy heads of banking and finance companies, and certainly not the media moguls and bloviating pundits.

The most powerful people are US, American consumers that account for over 70 percent of the economy. It is exactly now, when the economy is in the toilet, that consumers hold the maximum power. So why are we the people still deluding ourselves that the path to a better future rests on electing a new president?

We are suckers, conditioned by decades of clever marketing and advertising to believe the lies of politicians, and worst of all to believe that elections and our votes provide us with power. Wrong. Our real power can only be manifest through our spending dollars.

The overwhelming majority of Americans have been severely damaged by economic oppression by government policies that have produced historic economic inequality. Yet, despite revolting conditions, Americans seem unwilling to revolt by using their remaining economic power. They have let themselves become economic slaves.

What is amazing and depressing is that there are no national leaders from the worlds of politics, religion, education, media or public interest that are attempting to harness consumer power at this critical time. No one is capturing the public’s attention by making it crystal clear that consumers could obtain any political or economic reform in the public interest by joining together to withhold their discretionary spending.

Where are the anti-Iraq war leaders? Why are they not shouting about forcing an immediate commitment to ending the Iraq war by using the power of a massive consumer boycott that clearly could destroy the whole economy? Tell President Bush that consumers will greatly curb their spending for a month to give him time to implement a plan for withdrawal from Iraq. Make it clear that the coming federal rebates will not be used for spending. Make it clear that Bush inaction will result in continuation of the boycott.

Where is Ralph Nader, the ultimate consumer advocate? Why is he not proclaiming the brilliance of a consumer boycott as the winning tactic to force effective government assistance to the millions of Americans screwed by the sub-prime mortgage fiasco and about the lose their homes?

Where is Barack Obama, who supposedly wants to produce change? Rather than putting all his energy into satisfying his egoistic hunt for the presidency, why is he not talking about harnessing consumer power right now to get political reforms, like .ending trade agreements that are destroying the middle class? Why does he not send a clear message to his million-plus contributors to join a national consumer boycott to obtain immediate concessions from the Bush administration?

Where are the professors who have published books making the case for a second constitutional convention as the way to restore American democracy? Not one has the courage to say that the way to get Congress to obey Article V of the Constitution and convene that the first Article V convention is by American consumers threatening to plunge a dagger into the heart of American business.

Now is the time for all the millions of Americans that make up the 81 percent who see the nation on the wrong track to take action, to think like patriotic revolutionaries and take the power that now only exists with their spending. Sounds simple. All this strategy needs is leadership. Rather than spending so much time and energy on the media-hyped presidential campaign, we the people should demand that someone step forward to inform and mobilize consumers to become powerful citizens by using their spending as the ultimate populist political weapon.

[Joel S. Hirschhorn can be reached through www.delusionaldemocracy.com. He is a co-founder of Friends of the Article V Convention at www.foavc.org.]

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: statusquobuster, Robin, Christine, (#0)

Thirty years ago I would have favored a Condtitutionsl conevention. But now I am opposed. A Constititutional convention made up of minorities could ruin what is left of the American Republic.

I keep trying to explain to people that every time we add 50,000,000 people to this country through immigration that we have to bid oil away from foreigners with our depreciating dollars. Our dollars are dropping in value because we are adding legal and illegal immirants plus their children every day. The price of oil today passed $115 a barrel.

Consumers are not sovereign. The dollar will soon collapse. Our wages and pension will be cut at least in half. The dollar will decline in value until we can no longer afford to buy imported oil. No gas ,omey to drive to work. No home heating oil for the Northeast.

All three Presdidential candidates support Amnesty for Illegal Aliens. That means that they all hate us, want to cut our wages and pensions in half and will gleefully reduce us to slavery.

The Truth of 911 Shall Set You Free From The Lie

Horse  posted on  2008-04-16   18:20:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Horse, StatusquoBuster, Robin, Christine (#1)

Consumers are not sovereign.

...and will gleefully reduce us to slavery.

Strange, isn't it, that "Citizen" is so little used today. The American people are most often considered to be Taxpayers and Consumers.

True, Consumers and Taxpayers are not sovereign. They are created PERSONS who have a NUMBER. To further confuse the matter, they've been given a NAME that is very similar to the Name of the non-numbered Citizen who made application for the Social Security Card and NUMBER (an item of value in order to conduct business in the Democracy).

Who is conducting the business of making a living? As the System sees it, it is their created NUMBERED TAXPAYER PERSON.

Who is actually animating the NUMBERED TAXPAYER PERSON? Why, it is of course the flesh and blood Citizen who lends his/her consciousness and abilities to the legal entity NUMBERED TAXPAYER PERSON.

Why does the System insist upon "conducting business" with the NUMBERED TAXPAYER PERSON? Because the System only has jurisdiction over what it has created within its venue.

The flesh and blood Citizen has been rendered "invisible" to the System because the System has no authority over what has been created by the Almighty One.

We the People have already been unwittingly "reduced to slavery" by means of the New Deal; the true purpose of which was to bring all American People under control of the System (under the guise of Providing a Benefit) by creating NAMED and NUMBERED TAXPAYERS who would PAY the Social Security Income (1040) Tax.

However, Congress and the IRS, (their creation), must abide by the law. And the law does have provisions for asserting the true nature of the complex person that is the result of the New Deal.

SCPO Blackshoe Retired  posted on  2008-04-16   18:52:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: statusquobuster (#0)

Where are the anti-Iraq war leaders? Why are they not shouting about forcing an immediate commitment to ending the Iraq war by using the power of a massive consumer boycott that clearly could destroy the whole economy? Tell President Bush that consumers will greatly curb their spending for a month to give him time to implement a plan for withdrawal from Iraq. Make it clear that the coming federal rebates will not be used for spending. Make it clear that Bush inaction will result in continuation of the boycott.

Where's the tv remote? Where's my dinner? That's all they ask.

'Individuals should not take responsibility for their own defense. That’s what the police are for. ... If I oppose individuals defending themselves, I have to support police defending them. I have to support a police state.”' Alan Dershowitz

robin  posted on  2008-04-16   19:08:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest