4um: Well, What are You Supposed to Do with Traitors?

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles
Title: Well, What are You Supposed to Do with Traitors?
Source: [None]
URL Source: https://dailystormer.su/well-what-a ... -supposed-to-do-with-traitors/
Published: Jun 26, 2021
Author: Andrew Anglin
Post Date: 2021-06-26 10:56:17 by Ada
Keywords: None
Views: 232
Comments: 3

Crybaby liberal faggots like Will Sommer (who?) are whining because some bald guy on OAN said that the traitors who did fraud on the 2020 election should be rounded up and executed.
But what then are you supposed to do with traitors?
At first it was “we didn’t steal the election!”
Now it’s “well, sure, we stole the election – but there shouldn’t be any consequences for it!”
All the Jews and their lackeys are singing the same song – “we did it but don’t do anything to us!”
Click for Full Text!
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Ada (#0)
A cigarette and a white bandana.

randge posted on 2021-06-26 11:04:19 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: Ada (#0)
Crybaby liberal faggots like Will Sommer (who?) are whining because some bald guy on OAN said that the traitors who did fraud on the 2020 election should be rounded up and executed.

Any State that has used Dominion Voting Systems has unleashed the whirlwind.
Election Workers In Coffee County, Georgia Demonstrate Dominion Voting Machine Flaws

"When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one." Edmund Burke
BTP Holdings posted on 2021-06-26 11:44:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: BTP Holdings (#2)
The ability of adjudication is not a secret as I've seen that before in the election counting saga. The theory is that sometimes a ballot will have a stray mark on it that would register in the scanner as a vote but which in fact is obviously not intentional from the voter, and the adjudicator should in that case visually review the ballot and determine the nature of it and correct the ballot so it reflects the intent of the voter. Ditto for a vote mark but is present but not missed by the scanner because it's too dim or somewhat outside of the required space but still obviously intended by the voter as a vote.
Yes this adjudication power can enable the judge to massively alter the vote count results, but I guess the counter argument to that is that a vote counter could also simply lie about the vote totals they are responsible for tabulating, so it's little different from that and really confers no new abusive power than the supervisor already has.
Certainly such activity is exactly what should be monitored by poll watchers to ensure that gross and fraudulent alteration of votes does not occur.
In any event, the activity shown here does not incriminate the Dominion voting machine as it doesn't reflect any vote miscounting by the system itself.
In spite of my comment, I will add that there is no replacement for an actual manual count of ballots, as what was demonstrated here is an implicit trust in the scanner in cases where batches go through the counter and result in no reported anomalies.

Pinguinite posted on 2021-06-26 14:17:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um