Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: David Dees
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Jun 22, 2016
Author: .
Post Date: 2016-06-22 23:41:44 by christine
Keywords: None
Views: 335
Comments: 17

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

#5. To: christine (#0)

Prof James Fetzer who stripped away all of the hysteria and deception around the events at Sandy Hook. Fetzer and other journalists like Vivian Lee are dissecting Orlando in ways that raise giant questions about the story propagated thru the mainstream:

– By Sunday evening, the “dead” were still supposedly inside the night club – just like the kids reportedly left inside the Sandy Hook school. Did they not take them to the hospital? Where’s the emergency protocol? (CNN)

– News reports claimed that by Sunday evening only a few of the dead had been identified. But doesn’t everyone who frequents a bar carry an ID? By 8 pm Monday the names were in – read tearfully on the air by Anderson Cooper (CNN) and listed in full on Wikipedia.[4]

– News footage shows no dead people, or even visibly injured people, no ambulances rushing to the scene, no colored triage tarps, no EMTs swarming the site, or anything else that might prove the “massacre” actually occurred as reported. A few “injured victims” are shown casually walked or carried away from the club, with one dumped into the back of a pickup for transport to the hospital. Such scenes were played over and over on television. As with the Sandy Hook “shooting,” we are supposed to believe the reports, despite the clear lack of evidence. (CNN)

– To make up for this lack, we have a parade of witnesses, sobbing without tears and giving unconvincing performances, as seen with many recent false flag events. These include Luis Burbano, who gave interviews to several media outlets soon after the Orlando “shooting.” Like Carlos Arredondo of Boston Marathon fame, Burbano became the face of courage under duress, reportedly removing his shirt to wrap it around a man’s arm and tying another piece of his clothing to a man’s leg.[5]

- In his CNN interview, he said he put a “syringe” on the man’s arm – but then corrected this to say it was a tourniquet.[6] Like Arredondo, Burbano is an actor, with several films to his credit.[7] Screen Shot 2016-06-13 at 9.03.17 PM

– Interviews by assorted officials also sound scripted and strange. These include State Senator Geraldine Thompson, who tells us she is the senator for the district that includes the Pulse night club “in Tallahassee” – although Pulse is actually in Orlando. (CNN) – Drills were involved, as with many false flag events (more on this subject is sure to come). Oddly, the June 13 online edition of the Orlando Sentinelhighlighted an article originally published in 2015, regarding a drill to prepare nurses for mass casualties.[8]

Much more: jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2016/06/orlando-questions-and- anomalies.html

randge  posted on  2016-06-25   15:09:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#6. To: randge, Pinguinite, All (#5) (Edited)

Please listen to this discussion. One of the things said is that not one victim or witness is behaving in a way that reflects traumatization as they should after an event like this.

christine  posted on  2016-06-27   12:29:08 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#8. To: christine (#6)

One of the things said is that not one victim or witness is behaving in a way that reflects traumatization as they should after an event like this.

I listened to it but I don't see much in the way of substance.

It shows Napolitano stating the FBI record says no one was killed until 5:13 AM, but we still don't have a copy of that record. We like what Napolitano stands for on Constitutional matters and matters of Rights, but it's still second hand info. Is he quoting accurately from the report? And even if he is, the report could be wrong for a variety of reasons unrelated to the hoax theory. We don't know.

Critiquing the behavior of those who are alleged victims is conjecture. Have all the survivors been rounded up for psychological examination, or do we have only some brief clips of a few when they spoke to reporters? All we have is the latter, and it's not enough to draw a firm conclusion.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-06-27   21:38:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#12. To: Pinguinite (#8) (Edited)

Critiquing the behavior of those who are alleged victims is conjecture.

It is that. However, as every parent has experienced, there are times when you KNOW that your child is lying to you by the manner of his or her report and absent any other evidence. What we have seen in terms of witness testimony is the kind of behavior that would set off alarm bells in the head of the average detective spurring him to dig for corroboration and hard evidence.

Have all the survivors been rounded up for psychological examination, or do we have only some brief clips of a few when they spoke to reporters?

All the survivors that have been rounded up for public show leave me pretty cold. It's my personal opinion that they have not experienced the events as they report them.

Yet again, we are confronted with catastrophe, and what is left behind is the stench of deception.

randge  posted on  2016-06-28   8:35:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#14. To: randge (#12)

All the survivors that have been rounded up for public show leave me pretty cold. It's my personal opinion that they have not experienced the events as they report them.

It should be apparent though that survivors that are traumatized would likely not want to be interviewed or maybe wouldn't be capable of giving an interview. And in the case of Pulse, any survivors interviewed would be assumed to be gay, and while there's an obvious social push to remove the stigma of gayness, doubtless there are nonetheless many gay people who are not ready to go public.

Any any straight survivors might equally not want to do an interview that would cause people to assume they are gay.

So qualifications for being interviewed would basically be A) gay, B) not ashamed of it, and C) not overwhelmingly traumatized.

Pinguinite  posted on  2016-06-29   14:42:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#17. To: Pinguinite (#14)

"....maybe a very good reason to no longer be condemning homosexuality is so that homosexuals who are in politics are not open to blackmail and public shame, and can't be controlled by that." -- Mike Rivero the other nite.

Just quoting Mike Rivero :-)

NeoconsNailed  posted on  2016-06-29   15:04:20 ET  (1 image) Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Replies to Comment # 17.

        There are no replies to Comment # 17.

End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest