Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 18, 2013
Author: Adolf Wolf
Post Date: 2013-10-18 19:16:58 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 158
Comments: 7

Published on Sep 23, 2013

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

#6. To: Itistoolate (#0)

BBC not necessarily complicit. Their stringer may have been a Jew insider who knew the building was to come down and filed a story first to make a few bucks.

Tatarewicz  posted on  2013-10-19   0:25:14 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 6.

        There are no replies to Comment # 6.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest