Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Activism
See other Activism Articles

Title: UK Man Wins Court Case Against BBC For 9-11 WTC 7 Cover Up
Source: [None]
URL Source: [None]
Published: Oct 18, 2013
Author: Adolf Wolf
Post Date: 2013-10-18 19:16:58 by Itistoolate
Keywords: None
Views: 160
Comments: 7

Published on Sep 23, 2013

Tony Rooke refused to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.

So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.

For all intents and purposes a UK ccourt has just ruled that the BBC was complicit in the september 11th, 2001 attacks in the United States. Fantastic. A small victory but a huge symbolic victory and one you would have never otherwised have heard of. So I suggest to you the reader to get the word out on this one.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

#3. To: Itistoolate (#0)

What's the victory?

Tony Rooke had to pay £200 legal costs and he received a 6 month "conditional discharge."

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see the outcome as a victory for Tony Rooke.

scrapper2  posted on  2013-10-18   21:27:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: scrapper2 (#3)

Most significant in that the court recognized that 9.11 was a staged event, and held the BBC as a complicit actor that day.

Lod  posted on  2013-10-18   21:31:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Lod, all (#4)

The 'BBC v 9/11 Truth Court Case' - What The Judge Saw...

Itistoolate  posted on  2013-10-18   22:06:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 5.

        There are no replies to Comment # 5.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest