Title: THE AMERICAN IDIOT Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Oct 15, 2009 Author:GuerrillaNewsChannel Post Date:2010-02-16 08:18:42 by Itistoolate Keywords:None Views:207 Comments:3
Credit:hijackednation Just a great video capturing the essence of how the dumb down clueless idiot known as the American sheeple-has no idea what is truly going on or careless as they sit on there asses and sip suds as they watch dancing with the washed up celebrities
http://www.youtube.com/user/hijackednation
POLICE STATE cluless idiots useful idiot ron paul Max Keiser Gerald Celente Jim Rogers peter schiff wall st street Federal Reserve alex jones dollar wall st goldman sachs obama Tim Geithner glenn beck freedom to fascism 9/11 inside job msnbc goldman sachs jp morgan chase
They make a big deal about the stupidity of the american people, and its true. They refuse to see it because they are cowards. It's so much easier to just ignore it all. Let them die a cowards death. I dont want them anywhere near me.
Like the vid says, their tolerance of bullshit is legendary. So let them eat that bullshit. Sucks to be them.
Their toleration of bullshit and their stupidity will not keep the system from crashing down due to its own weight.
But O good Lord! What strange phenomenon is this? What name shall we give it? What is the nature of this misfortune? What vice is it, or, rather, what degradation? To see an end- less multitude of people not merely obeying, but driven to servility? Not ruled, but tyrannized over? These wretches have no wealth, no kin, nor wife nor children, not even life itself that they can call their own. They suffer plundering, wanton- ness, cruelty, not from an army, not from a barbarian horde, on account of whom they must shed their blood and sacrifice their lives, but from a single man; not from a Hercules nor from a Samson, but from a single little man. Too frequently this same little man is the most cowardly and effeminate in the nation, a stranger to the powder of battle and hesitant on the sands of the tournament; not only without energy to direct men by force, but with hardly enough virility to bed with a common woman! Shall we call subjection to such a leader cowardice? Shall we say that those who serve him are cow- ardly and faint-hearted? If two, if three, if four, do not defend themselves from the one, we might call that circumstance sur- prising but nevertheless conceivable. In such a case one might be justified in suspecting a lack of courage. But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indiffer- ence rather than cowardice? When not a hundred, not a thou- sand men, but a hundred provinces, a thousand cities, a mil- lion men, refuse to assail a single man from whom the kind- est treatment received is the infliction of serfdom and slavery, what shall we call that? Is it cowardice? Of course there is in every vice inevitably some limit beyond which one cannot go. Two, possibly ten, may fear one; but when a thousand, a mil- lion men, a thousand cities, fail to protect themselves against the domination of one man, this cannot be called cowardly, for cowardice does not sink to such a depth, any more than valor can be termed the effort of one individual to scale a fortress, to attack an army, or to conquer a kingdom. What monstrous vice, then, is this which does not even deserve to be called cowardice, a vice for which no term can be found vile enough, which nature herself disavows and our tongues refuse to name?
- The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude by ÉTIENNE DE LA BOÉTIE
Patriot Henry's note: the whole thing by Boetie is worth reading. My conclusion is that the explanation is "Stockholm Syndrome", in which the victim identifies with their victimizer in order to survive.
In such a case one might be justified in suspecting a lack of courage. But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indiffer- ence rather than cowardice?
Indifference? I think that is also a possibility. I see it as being related to cowardice and not a separate idea.
Stockholm syndrome on a massive scale? I'm not a shrink so I can't answer that.
I think there are many more out there just like us. More than we imagine. Because we don't get the real news from MSM.
Perhaps you will agree that the media is perpetuating an illusion?
How many give a rats ass about Paris and Nicole, or who Britney is flashing her crotch to today? Anyone out there really depressed because your local team isn't doing well?
You have the media illusion vs todays reality. The media will never admit that they are losing this battle. They are losing. Look at their losses vs the internet. They are going bankrupt because they are losing their audiences.
There is only 1 reason I can come up with that explains those losses. People are waking up to what the MSM is all about and don't want anything to do with it anymore.
But that doesn't mean that there aren't idiots out there that think celebrity news and other stupidity is important to them. Unfortunately that is the stereotype of the people out there that is perpetuated by the MSM. That stereotype, IMO, is THE illusion. They feed the cowards to keep them pacified.