Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

(s)Elections
See other (s)Elections Articles

Title: Michelle and Farrakhan's Wife Together in Photo
Source: Western Voices World News
URL Source: http://www.wvwnews.net
Published: Jun 4, 2008
Author: SusanUnPC
Post Date: 2008-06-05 22:19:07 by rack42
Keywords: BARACK, Michelle, Farrakhan
Views: 2244
Comments: 64

Check out one facet of BARACK OBAMA’s “inner circle” — most of the women shown here represent a hidden inner circle that has played important roles in getting him elected. The Nation of Islam is not just another neighborhood group. Is the Nation of Islam the next one slated to go under the bus?

THE PHOTOGRAPH UNDERSCORES the virtually ignored role that Louis Farrakhan and his wife, Mother Khadijah Farrakhan, have played in the POLITICAL RISE of Barack and Michelle Obama.

From JET Magazine, a powerful Chicago-based publication, July 26, 2004

(1 image)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: rack42 (#0)

I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you.

Send this image to the People's Collective forthwith.

We need the meaning of this interpreted for us by a band of lawyers, one more insane than the next :P

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-05   22:25:55 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Jethro Tull (#1) (Edited)

Your source: Western Voices World News (www.wvwnews.net) is a web media division of European Americans United, an ethics-based activist organization dedicated to the exaltation of classical European values. EAU is a membership-based volunteer organization. If you like the content of our news site, chances are you are a good candidate for membership in our parent organization.

Western Voices World News is a media source that puts forth both original hard- fact reporting and original opinion content, along with aggregating news and opinion of interest to European-Americans from credible sources around the world.

Gutter trolling, are we, rack42 (sorry for the mistaken "to", JT)?

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-05   22:29:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Jethro Tull (#1)

Farrakhan responds to charge of anti-Semitism (Al-Jazeera)

Sounds like he's just askin'.

buckeye  posted on  2008-06-05   22:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Arator (#2)

As with most of you Obama cultists, I have no idea what you're talking about.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-05   22:34:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Arator (#2)

it's only a photograph, what's your objection?

christine  posted on  2008-06-05   22:34:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: christine (#5) (Edited)

it's only a photograph, what's your objection?

This unsourced characterization: "Check out one facet of BARACK OBAMA’s “inner circle” — most of the women shown here represent a hidden inner circle that has played important roles in getting him elected."

The photograph itself without context is meaningless. And considering the source of the characterization, it is questionable (to say the least).

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-05   22:36:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Arator (#2)

Gutter trolling, are we, rack42 (sorry for the mistaken "to", JT)?

What have you to say about the photo?

Is it faked? Is it meaningful?

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   22:38:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Arator (#2)

Frankly, I don't care which fucking piece of shit gets to be president. A piece of shit is still shit.

The recent denials that Obama is associated with Farrakhan kinda stuck in my craw.

So, what say you? Is the photo a fake? Why would Michelle allow herself to be photographed with Farrakhan's babe?

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   22:45:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: rack42 (#7)

Is it faked? Is it meaningful?

You have provided no information to assess its significance. The "information" that you have provided is dubious at best. Based on that alone, my guess is that its significance is high for paranoid racist "European Americans". For everyone else, it's a yawner.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-05   22:48:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: rack42 (#8)

Are you saying that anyone who was in the same photo frame with W or Bill Clinton is a scumbag?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   22:49:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: rack42 (#8) (Edited)

Why would Michelle allow herself to be photographed with Farrakhan's babe?

Um, maybe they both live in Chicago and attended the same public function/social event. What does that tell us about either of them? Absolutely nothing.

Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.

Arator  posted on  2008-06-05   22:51:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Arator (#6)

The photograph itself without context is meaningless.

I guess that this was just a neighborhood meeting, and the photo was to commemorate something. A birthday party, perhaps.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   22:53:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Arator (#11)

Ah, as my post below: a birthday party.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   22:54:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: a vast rightwing conspirator, Arator, Ds in Drag (#10)

Are you saying that anyone who was in the same photo frame with W or Bill Clinton is a scumbag?

We're saying that Obama and Clinton are scumbags, and scumbags attract other scumbags. It's like a political theorem-thingie.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-05   23:00:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: buckeye (#3)

Good stuff Buck. Thanks.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-05   23:01:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#10)

Are you saying that anyone who was in the same photo frame with W or Bill Clinton is a scumbag?

No.

I simply posted a photo of Michelle Obama and the wife of Farrakan.

I'm amazed at the responses.

I do conclude that Michelle Obama was in contact with The Nation of Islam.

I have no idea what that was about.

It's just a photo.

Get over it.

Oh, and accuse me of whatever may be your biases.

Thank you, very much.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:01:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Jethro Tull (#14)

White guilters are ever vigilant.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:04:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: rack42, Jethro Tull (#0)

And even if we win, if we win, HAH! Even if we win! Even if we play so far above our heads that our noses bleed for a week to ten days; even if God in Heaven above comes down and points his hand at our side of the field; even if every man woman and child held hands together and prayed for us to win, it just wouldn't matter because all the really good looking girls would still go out with the guys from Mohawk because they've got all the money! It just doesn't matter if we win or we lose. IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER!

Keisha Brown, 21, from Chicago, whose mother has a nightgown with a picture of Obama on it, said, “Everything will be different now.”

Tauzero  posted on  2008-06-05   23:09:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Cynicom, Arator (#17)

#7. To: Mekons5 (#6)

Webb would be the perfect VP, but we can't let his senate seat go to some Repuke scumbag.

The governor of VA is a Dem. I think the seat is safe.

Obama-Webb is my dream ticket. I hope it happens.

Arator

Arator, your political odyssey has taken you full circle. You have passed thru your constitutional phase and enter all we once despised; the socialist, big government clique. Honest to god, you have no political principles.

Jethro Tull  posted on  2008-06-05   23:11:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Arator (#9)

You have provided no information to assess its significance.

I posted a photo of Michelle with Farrakan's wife. The photo was purportedly from a Jet publication, circa July 26, 2004.

Go argue with Jet as to its "significance."

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:13:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: rack42 (#16)

Did you know that there is only one degree of separation between Obama and Hitler? I bet you didn't know that.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:17:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: All (#20)

Just for info: Wayback (www.archive.org) doesn't have any ebonyjet.com archive prior to 2006.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:19:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Jethro Tull (#19) (Edited)

Webb would be the perfect VP, but we can't let his senate seat go to some Repuke scumbag.

Awww gee...

In his own words little ole Arator is just another partisan hack that believes in Santa and the lovely two party system.

Partisan sheep that believe their Savior has arrived make one think about saliva tests for voters.

Any new Pied piper arrives and off they go, all in a line, stupid lemmings.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:19:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#21)

Did you know that there is only one degree of separation between Obama and Hitler? I bet you didn't know that.

No, I didn't. Please expound.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:20:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: rack42 (#24)

You should do your research. Slate had a contest on the topic and, it seems, Obama's connections (by association) to Hitler are numerous.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:22:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: rack42 (#24)

Ever notice ole Hitler always enters every discussion but never his ole buddy Stalin.

White guilters are Israel firsters, America lasters.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:22:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Cynicom (#26)

I bet you are a lot closer related to Stalin than Obama is to Dick Cheney.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:25:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#25)

You should do your research. Slate had a contest on the topic and, it seems, Obama's connections (by association) to Hitler are numerous.

And the photo is connected to Hitler?

Why don't you tell me why Michell Obama was photographed with Farrakan's wife.

That would settle this, don't ya think?

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:26:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#27)

I get down on my knees every night and pray that I might not be related to any WHITE GUILTER.

They are a disgusting segment of society.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:26:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: rack42 (#28)

I have no idea why some woman was photographed with some other woman.

For the record, I was photographed with Clinton - was in the same photograph Clinton was in. Also, if you ever come to my house and go potty, you will see an autographed W photo in my guest bathroom.

What do these mean? Can anyone guess? I know what they mean but I won't tell.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:28:58 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: Cynicom (#29)

Are you calling comrade Stalin a White Guilter?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:29:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: Cynicom (#17)

White guilters are ever vigilant.

Do I fit in there somewhere? I don't think so.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-06-05   23:29:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#33. To: Fred Mertz (#32)

Fred...You have suffered for a long time from so many unkind human maladies that one more wont hurt, whether it fits or not.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:31:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#31)

Comrade Stalin had blacks shot.

Ever read history????

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:32:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#35. To: Fred Mertz (#32)

Ask him if he would consider me a 'white guilter' I bet he'd say 'yes'.

Then, tell him that I defended the Stormfronters yesterday. There are a couple of posts I made that prove that.

He would then tell you that the Stormfront is controlled by the Jews.

It gets THIS stupid and absurd.

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:32:56 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: Cynicom (#33)

You're a cranky old man, and it shows.

You should lighten up and enjoy life.

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-06-05   23:33:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#37. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#30)

I have no idea why some woman was photographed with some other woman.

Yet you tell me that she is somehow connected to Hitler by "one degree of separation."

Very curious.

rack42  posted on  2008-06-05   23:33:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#38. To: Fred Mertz (#36)

Cranky????

I remember you from toooo many years ago.

Cynicom  posted on  2008-06-05   23:34:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#39. To: Cynicom (#34)

LOL. The proportion of whites shot vs. blacks shot by comrade Stalin is about one million to one. Therefore, comrade Stalin was a white guilter.

Yes?

Antiparty - find out why, think about 'how'

a vast rightwing conspirator  posted on  2008-06-05   23:34:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#40. To: a vast rightwing conspirator (#35)

Read my previous reply, avwc.

Did we meet in DC?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2008-06-05   23:35:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  



      .
      .
      .

Comments (41 - 64) not displayed.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest