4um: GREAT VICTORY OVER IRS - Tom Cryer - The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles
Title: GREAT VICTORY OVER IRS - Tom Cryer - The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax
Source: Liberty Post
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=193689
Published: Jul 12, 2007
Author: D Wornock
Post Date: 2007-07-12 00:17:47 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: Abolish, The, IRS
Views: 11215
Comments: 62

Today at about 5:30 PM Attorney Tom Cryer was found not guilty to all charges of willful failure to file by the jury in Federal District Court, Shreveport LA. I attended the 2-1/2 day trial. The judge assisted the prosecution in every way possible, and the prosecution lied claiming there is a law requiring most Americans to file. However, the jury saw through the lies and believed Tom Cryer.

The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax. All the prosecution could point out was rulings by two lower courts. However, as Tom Cryer stated The lower courts cannot overturn the Supreme Court and Tom Cryer stated numerous Supreme Court Ruling that conflicted with the IRS version of the law.

The Brilliant Tom Cryer:

Cryer’s strategy is to have the indictment dismissed on the merits of his constitutional and statutory arguments. He has filed an approximately 100-page motion that can be described in one word – “brilliant.”

UPDATES

How to Keep 100% of Your Earnings

America: From Freedom To Fascism
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Comments (1-11) not displayed.
.
.
.

#12. To: All (#11)
THE AGONY, THE ECSTASY, THE AGONY - Part 1

THE AGONY, THE ECSTASY, THE AGONY - Part 2
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 3:06:01 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#13. To: RickyJ (#4)
This is why people pay. Fear. That's all the federal goons have. Fear. The people fear the IRS. They fear corrupt judges(practically all). They fear ignorant and gullible jurors(most). The federal goons don't care about the law.

http://www.triallogs.com/

Tom Cryer Trial

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 04 July 2007

Tom Cryer’s trial is scheduled to take place on Monday, July 9, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., at the U. S. District Court, 300 Fannin St., Shreveport, Louisiana. They will be doing the preliminaries before the trial starts, so if you were there at 1:30 p.m., you would still be on time. They need your presence at this trial, they want to fill up the courtroom, please go early if you are able to go. Again, the preliminaries begin at 9:30 a.m., they are predicting the actual trial should get started somewhere around 1:30 p.m. Use your own judgment. In the event the courtroom is filled when you get there, please assemble outside the courtroom in a non-adversarial manner. We need to show respect, be courteous, quite, and attentive. We will endeavor to check with his office this Friday to confirm the trial is still scheduled to go forward.

Tom Cryer Trial - Day One

Written by djahn
Monday, 09 July 2007

Trial started today with the announcement that the DOJ wanted to abandon the two evasion charges, felonies, and prosecute instead on two counts of failure to file.
A jury was selected this afternoon. You never know whether you've done well or poorly until you get the outcome.
Tomorrow starts with evidence and the gov't should wrap up early in the day and then it's Mr Cryer's turn. He is ready to go. The only question remaining is how successful they will be in stopping him from telling the truth.
We'll convey more as it comes available.

Tom Cryer Trial - Day Two

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 11 July 2007

Here is an update we received from those in attendance. ###

Day Two started with the government presenting its case in the morning session and Tom taking the stand and offering his direct testimony until the close of yesterday's proceedings...
The government first brought an IRS supervisor to the stand... her testimony established the paperwork flow and indicated that Tommy filed "employer" documentation for his "employee" but did not file his individual returns.
Next was Tommy's secretary... she did not show up as a hostile witness towards the prosecution... but in the same breath, she did not give the government any help when she testified that she fills out all of her own IRS forms required of the employer, and even writes and signs most of the checks!
The DOJ tried to get in a point in that area... and she said that Tommy gave her the option to file or not-- then he abruptly stopped her... then on another question... she added that it was her choice to file even after she found out that there was no law making her liable-- where of course, he cut her off again.
The CPA took the stand and testified to profit and loss statements related to Tommy's practice of law... he simply established the numbers but never stated with authority to the lawful and legal definition of income... Larry was able to establish that the CPA had only a very insignificant understanding of the IRC.
The government's final witness was an IRS "special agent" in the Criminal Investigation Division who testified to the 'audits' of Tom's business and on Larry's cross-exam made it clear that the 'Code" is enormous and he only knew small bits and pieces of some of it... The IRS used Section 61 of the IRC to prop up its claim of liability to file and pay income taxes... but failed to clarify the first three words of Section 61... which state, "Unless otherwise provided..."
After lunch Tom took the stand...
There were some fireworks during Tom's testimony and the judge was clearly aggravated with the rule of law being presented in 'his' courtroom... and several times stopped Tom's testimony. One of those times the judge brought up the "Cheek" ruling where Larry and the judge went around and around on Tom's right to present his beliefs to the jury.
The judge overruled an objection of the prosecutor on another occasion but also warned Larry about the "very narrow" path he's taking the case and will not allow Tom to argue that the IRS is unconstitutional... which of course Tom never intended to do and has not done in the least.
Day Two ended with the judge calling counsel into the judge's chamber and unloading... venting his frustration mainly aimed at Larry and Tom taking over the courtroom and plowing ahead with getting the Internal Revenue Code... the Code of Federal Regs, the Constitution and a plethora of Supreme Court cases in front of the jury.
At the close of yesterday's hearing... the judge ordered Larry to turn over Tom's notes and research to the DOJ as the court believed that Tom's notebook filled with law and supporting Supreme Court cases was "discovery" and therefore the DOJ was entitled to it...
Larry quickly agreed to that and even told the court that it would be a very good thing for the prosecutor to read and urged the prosecutor to read it carefully and essentially looked forward to seeing more of it in the record and presented to the jury during cross-examination of Tom's beliefs.
Day three promises to be very interesting! The parties will meet prior to the start to discuss jury instructions before the jury is brought in and seated. The DOJ opens day three with cross-examination and Larry's re-direct may well occur before noon and closing arguments will surely take place before the close of today's proceedings...
Please let everyone know that http://www.truthattack.org will be providing you with exclusive MP3 audio interviews with Larry, Tommy (if possible) and attendees of the court proceedings and anyone else that I can get my microphone in front of today!

From: Bob Schulz
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:00 PM
To: Bob Hurt
Subject: [We The People] NOT GUILTY! Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ

NOT GUILTY!

July 11, 2007

Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ
According to our court-watcher we can tell you the following:
At the start of the trial the DOJ withdrew the felony charges, leaving two counts of willful failure to file.
The Constitution and the law were allowed into the courtroom. Although Cryer was able to tell the jury what he read, he was not allowed to show the jury what he read. Cryer was also able to tell the jury what he did not read in the law because he could not find it in the law - the law that made him liable to file and pay the federal income tax.
Tom did a good job of explaining to the jury what he read in the Brushhaber, Stanton and Eisner Supreme Court cases about the legal meaning of the word "income" and what he read in the Internal Revenue Code - everything but the law that required him to file. Tom had asked the IRS to show him the law that made him liable but the IRS did not respond.
Larry Becraft's closing arguments were "flawless."
Compared to the judges in the Simkanin and Schiff cases, Cryer's judge was "Cinderella."
Congratulations Tom and Larry. We are looking forward to your full report.
More details to follow on our website.
http://www.givemeliberty.org

Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 11 July 2007

This update was reportedly distributed by We the People. I'm on a conference call right now. I'm fairly confident this report is accurate.
David Jahn

http://truthattack.org/
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 3:36:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#14. To: christine (#13)
WHY THE IRS AND INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ABSOLUTELY HATE THE INTERNET
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 3:45:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#15. To: Uncle Bill, christine, Zipporah, Jethro Tull, Lodwick (#11)
Some Patriot Photos

I've met Godfrey Lehman, Irwin Schiff and Red Beckman in person, and I've spoken with attorney Larry Becraft on the phone.
Lehman (who is from San Francisco) once told a story to a group of us about his experience on jury duty. It was his position that one should not have to forfeit one right (privacy) in order to exercise another (serving on a jury) so, when an attorney asked him a question he replied with "I object, that question is a violation of my right to privacy".
The judge said "YOU GET OUT OF MY COURTROOM!"
Lehman was shocked by the judge's reaction. And, he makes a most convincing argument that voir dire is unconstitutional, and that lawyers are controlling juries to an extent never intended by the founders.
For instance, why does knowing a defendant render one unsuitable for jury duty? When the first Europeans landed in Plymouth and Jamestown, could they not hold trials because everyone knew everyone else?
No, the reason why lawyers don't want us to know a defendant is so they can paint a false picture of their clients, and if you know the defendants' character it would be much harder to fool you.
Irwin Schiff called me twice collect from prison at my request and expense years ago, too. I didn't have any tax problems, I just wanted to chat and tell him how much he helped me!
And, Red Beckman told me how he and Bill Benson researched the 16th amendment and proved it was never ratified. He said that when he provided the evidence to the 9th circuit, the judge said "This is a political matter on which we cannot rule!" and he ordered the steno not to make a transcript of the hearing!
The govt knows that it's a swindle, folks, believe me.

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2007-07-12 4:09:15 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#16. To: HOUNDDAWG, christine (#15)
"The govt knows that it's a swindle, folks, believe me."

Yep.
Read the yellow highlights
WE THE PEOPLE - Store

THE GREAT IRS HOAX
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 5:00:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#17. To: HOUNDDAWG, christine (#15)
Just tell the IRS your income is a capital gain. I'm sure they'll understand.

http://www.ombwatch.org / article/articleview/3898/
Wall Street Tax Break Comes under Scrutiny

After decades of flying below the radar screen, a tax policy allowing private equity fund managers to claim their fee-based income as capital gains rather than ordinary income has suddenly become the subject of media scrutiny, congressional hearings and legislation. In June, the Blackstone Group, a large private equity firm, went public with an initial public offering, which resulted in billion-dollar profits for the principals. This triggered House Ways & Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee chairs Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) and Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) to question the tax breaks that helped enable the billion-dollar profits. They announced their intention to examine tax policy regarding so-called "carried interest," a type of performance fee that is a major source of compensation for fund managers. Rep. Sander Levin (D- MI) has introduced a bill to eliminate the carried interest tax loophole altogether. In response, high-powered lobbyists have gathered to fight back. A classic confrontation between industry and taxpayer interests may be looming.
The policy question concerns part of the fee that fund managers usually collect for their services. They typically negotiate a percentage of any profits on their fund's investments, called "carried interest" because, oftentimes, funds do not produce profits for several years. Because the income comes, when it does, following the sale of the fund's security assets, the argument is made that this income is like dividends or capital gains and so should be taxed at a maximum rate of 15 percent.
However, some tax experts have argued that carried interest is no different from ordinary income, which is taxed at rates of up to 35 percent. The risk element in fund managers' compensation for services is quite different from investors' risk. The latter may lose every penny they have invested in the funds; they may also reap capital gains if fund assets are sold at a profit. Fund managers may not be personally invested in the funds they manage at all — in this case, they have no "downside" risk of financial loss; they may simply fail to be due compensation if the fund does not perform well enough. It is a form of contingency fee.
Advocates of current policy, such as Lisa McGreevy, executive vice president of the Managed Funds Association, say that ''the whole issue is fundamental to entrepreneurship in the United States and the ability to use sweat equity to build long-term investments.'' Victor Fleischer, a University of Illinois tax professor, believes that perhaps private equity funds, hedge funds and others benefiting from the tax treatment have total assets under management of up to $1 trillion. It is unclear whether taxes on fund managers relate at all to investor activity.
Advocates of closing the carried interest tax loophole question the equity of current policy, which, Fleischer estimates, reduces fund managers' taxes by $4- 6 billion a year. Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT) says that ''there is absolutely no reason some of the richest partnerships in the world should be able to rip off American taxpayers because of a tax loophole.'' On the other side, the lobbyists are trying to convince Congress that such legislation would hurt the average citizen. Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA) was quoted in the July 10 Washington Post as saying, "This is a tax increase not only on those working on Wall Street, but also on all blue-jean-wearing Americans because of its effect on their retirement funds."

A key moment in the debate came on June 12, when former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, speaking to a tax reform conference run by Brookings' Hamilton Project said,
It seems to me what is happening is people are performing a service, managing people's money in a private equity form and fees for that service would ordinarily be thought of as ordinary income. A week and a half later, Levin introduced his bill to end the tax treatment of these fees as capital gains. A dozen other House members have now co-sponsored the bill, including Rangel and House Financial Services Committee Chair Barney Frank (D-MA). Rangel subsequently announced that he would hold a hearing on the legislation in July. Baucus has scheduled the first of two hearings by the Senate Finance Committee, to be held July 11.
The prospects for the Levin legislation in the House seem favorable, given the heft of those who have endorsed it. However, the Cantor-led forces include some of the most powerful lobbyists in town. In the Senate, Baucus and Finance Committee ranking member Charles Grassley (R-IA) have not taken a position on the issue. But in his most direct statement on it to date, Grassley, who has strongly supported tax breaks for business in the past, implied that the carried interest tax preference is
failing to maintain the integrity of the 15% capital-gains rate… What I'm doing is an effort to ward off the demagogues on Capitol Hill that can say this is just a way for the rich to get richer, and the middle class to be stung... I would ask my Republican colleagues to look at it from that standpoint, that we want to make sure we aren't feeding the demagoguery of class warfare that the other party is always getting blue ribbons for doing. Whatever Congress decides, it is possible that President Bush will declare that ending this tax loophole is a tax increase and veto it on those grounds.

Say what?
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 5:44:47 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#18. To: Uncle Bill (#17)
... it is possible that President Bush will declare that ending this tax loophole is a tax increase and veto it on those grounds.

Quite possible, since Bush wants to free all investment capital and corporate profits from taxation and make it a wage withholding tax only!
Do you believe this guy?
This move would do the exact opposite of what was promised during debates about the tax.
And, this is also why corporations are all too happy to withhold from their employees' wages. The company pays little or no taxes and they compensate with money from their workers.

HOUNDDAWG posted on 2007-07-12 5:53:52 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#19. To: HOUNDDAWG (#18)
Source
Memorandum
To: Participants in Conference on Tax Rebellion Movement
From: Regional Commissioner Western Region
Subject: Tax Rebellion in California
I am sending you the minutes of our meeting of February 9, 1973, on the Tax Rebellion Movement. These minutes enumerate action items for the Los Angeles and San Francisco District Directors and for Regional Office officials.
I appreciate your past attention to this serious matter and feel confident that all of us working together can successfully overcome this challenge to our tax system.
/s/ Homer O. Croasmun
Regional Commissioner
Attachment
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 1 of 6
Minutes of February 9, 1973 Conference on Tax Rebellion Movement in California
Participants
Mr. Croasmun, Regional Director Mr. Schwartz, Regional Counsel Mr. Rowe, Regional Inspector Mr. Kingman, District Director, San Francisco Mr. Schmidt, District Director, Los Angeles Mr. McCart, Acting Assistant Regional Commissioner, Intelligence Mr. Hansen, Chief, Los Angeles Mr. Howard, Chief, San Francisco Mr. Monzon, Chief, Enforcement, Regional Office, BATF Mr. Vargofcak, Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge, San Francisco Mr. Dvorak, Assistant Regional Inspector Mr. Pollock, Regional Protective Programs Manager Mr. Busalacchi, Regional Public Affairs Officer Mr. Krause, Regional Coordinator, Tax Rebellion Movement
Mr. Croasmun opened the conference with a review of the history of the Tax Rebellion Movement. He stated we should set up our metes and bounds to achieve our goals; that we do not have unlimited manpower so we must focus on the total program and concentrate on the leaders of the movement attacking IRS.
Mr. Croasmun pointed out that seven months ago we changed our direction on Tax Rebellion cases from a defensive posture and have now seized the initiative by infiltration of their organization so we now know in advance of their plans before they execute them. This is vital and we must continue to stay aggressive if we are to enforce the revenue laws and to protect the Service from attack by tax rebel militants.
Mr. Croasmun stated that we are not limiting ourselves to the sanctions in the Revenue Code, but are using all the available law enforcement machinery whether it be federal, state or local laws: for example, if a tax rebel leader is violating a state law by carrying a concealed weapon, we should use state enforcement to prosecute him; and, if there is a firearms violation, ATF agents should be alerted.
Mr. Howard advised that he had been advised by the Detroit District that since ( ) spoke on the radio in Cleveland, there had been a flood of General Motors employees submitting false forms W-4. Mr. Busalacchi stated he had a report that ( ) had been active in Albuquerque.
Mr. Hansen advised that a ( ) of Ventura County had attempted to file false forms [sic] W-4; that he is now leading the Mariposa camp of militants organized by ( ) the ( ).
Mr. Vargofcak said the sheriff of Mariposa County had been checking on the activities of ( ) since May 1972, when the ( ) bought the Mariposa property from ( ); that ( ) is a close personal friend of ( ) that ( ) has a state criminal record; that he has three or four firearms; and that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms has a case on ( ).
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 2 of 6
Mr. Schmidt pointed out that there are varying degrees of militancy in the various tax rebellion groups; that in the Los Angeles District, Taxpayers Anonymous in Orange County, led by ( ) and ( ) is the most militant; and that we should keep this in mind in deciding our targets.
Mr. Monzon gave a summary of laws enforced by the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms which could be used on tax rebel cases. He pointed out it is not a federal violation to carry a gun unless the person has a felony record; that an automatic pistol is not an "automatic" gun under the definitions of BATF unless one pull of the trigger will discharge multiple shots; that explosives are a federal violation; and, likewise, "silencers" are a violation. He said he wanted more information about a report that tax rebels are able to buy silencers in Phoenix, as this would be a clear violation.
Mr. Howard advised he has been conferring with state tax officials who are anxious to cooperate with IRS in the attack on tax rebels who also do not pay state taxes; often the state can move quickly to close up a tax rebel's business or revoke his license; that we should see that the state uses its enforcement machinery on those cases which are not our targets.
Mr. Croasmun reported on his discussions with Assistant U. S. Attorney Couris and Judge Crocker, Fresno, and of their interest in enforcement of the law in tax rebel cases. Mr. Hansen commented on the problem of federal judges appearing to be anti-IRS based on a belief that IRS is "highhanded." Mr. Howard reported on a change of attitude in federal judges in San Francisco after he met with a number of them and discussed the gravity of the Tax Rebellion Movement and the importance of giving prison sentences as deterrents.
There was a general discussion of the importance of meeting with U.S. Attorneys and federal judges to acquaint them with the full picture of the tax rebellion movement. Mr. Croasmun pointed out that after his meeting with Mr. Couris and Judge Crocker, they requested background information on the Movement which was furnished them.
Mr. Kingman suggested the possibility of requesting religious leaders to warn their following against participation in the movement, pointing to the beneficial effects of Mormon Church President Lee's message.
Mr. Howard advised that after his discussion with the federal judges they said they had not full background information on some of the defendants to whom they had given light sentences.
Mr. Schwartz suggested that the Porth-type cases not prosecuted should at least be considered for fraud penalties or other civil penalties.
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 3 of 6
Mr. Schwartz also advised the district directors that they should instruct employers who receive false forms W-4 or W-4E which they know to be false through admission of employee or knowledge of previous employment that the employer should disregard the false exemption certificate and withhold on the basis of zero exemptions or on the basis of a former correct form W-4.
There was a general discussion on the problem of detecting false W-4 or W-4E cases where the taxpayer does not so advise the government or the employer does not do so; and, particularly so where the taxpayer completes his action by not filing any form of 1040 at year end, but becomes an "IRS dropout." With the present limited matching at the Service Centers of the filing index with prior years' returns, or employers' copies of W-2's with filing indexes, such cases will probably never be detected. Suggestions were made that we use all available means to reach employers to advise them of their responsibility to advise IRS when they receive a suspected false form W-4 or W-4E. Also, we should use our liaison contacts with the Tax Executive Institute to get the message to them of their responsibility in such cases and of advising employer-clients. Also, we should use trade journals to reach employers with this message. Also, we should use Circular E for this purpose.
Mr. Krause pointed out the importance of close planning on common targets by the tax rebellion project supervisors of the Los Angeles and San Francisco districts with planning meetings as needed.
Action Items for District Directors:
1. Maintain the initiative in the attack on the tax rebels.
2. Know their plans before they arrive at our door to execute them.
3. Identify the leaders of the Movement and concentrate on them.
4. Have a plan of action in coordination with the Region rather than hit and miss defensive reactions.
5. Continue and step up the infiltration in-depth of the Movement.
6. Use all available federal, state and local laws.
7. Use civil penalties on Porth-type cases.
8. Wage a campaign to educate U.S. Attorneys and federal judges with the importance of prison sentences on cases.
9. District Directors to continue to follow up cases of admitted or known false W-4's or W-4E's to advise employers of responsibilities in such cases and follow up to see that proper 1040's are filed at the filing season.
10. Use State taxing agencies willing to cooperate on enforcement of laws on tax rebels.
11. Los Angeles and San Francisco project supervisors to hold periodic planning meetings on common targets.
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 4 of 6
Action Items for Region:
1. Use Tax Executive Institute liaison to inform tax consultants and their client-employers of their duties on suspected false exemption cases.
2. Consider requesting legislation or an IRS published ruling to require employers to file with service centers a copy of amended W-4 or W-4E forms.
3. Use Circular E, The employer's Tax Guide on Withholding, to inform employers of responsibilities on suspected false exemption cases.
4. Use trade journals to reach employers for same purpose.
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 5 of 6
Supplement 1 (Rev. 3)
RC-W Memorandum 12-24
Regional Objective RC-W4
PUBLIC AWARENESS OF THE ROLE OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
The Service should be acutely aware of its responsibility to enhance the belief of the American public that Internal Revenue Service is an effective tax administration body, maintaining the highest principles of integrity.
Heads of Office should take positive steps to insure that appropriate managers are aware of and responsive to concerns and contacts with professional groups, the communication media and the taxpaying public. The Service must maintain the capacity to respond timely and intelligently to concerns or issues raised by the public.
Areas of Consideration
* Evaluate, appraise and react to the tax mood of the nation and of local areas. Heads of Office should impress on all employees the value of effective, professional tax administration as a counterpoint to attacks on the self- assessment system.
* Maintain an effective Public Affairs program designed to produce pertinent and effective public information concerning both tax and economic stabilization matters.
* Recognize the sensitive problems connected with the organized tax resistance movement. Be aware of the need for diligent enforcement action against organized tax protestors who flagrantly violate the tax laws.
* Heads of Office should be aware of their roles as public spokesmen in explaining to the general public and to responsible business and professional groups the Service's role in the administration of both our tax system and the economic stabilization program.
Official Use Only
Croasmun Memorandum: Page 6 of 6
# # #

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries, then
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers,
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid.

Put these words
up on his tomb,
"Taxes drove me
to my doom..."

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.

Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax,
Fuel permit tax
Gasoline Tax (42 cents per gallon)
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Interest expense
Inventory tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service charge taxes
Social Security Tax
Road usage taxes
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone federal excise tax
Telephone federal universal service fee tax
Telephone federal, state and local surcharge taxes
Telephone minimum usage surcharge tax
Telephone recurring and non-recurring charges tax
Telephone state and local tax
Telephone usage charge tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

COMMENTS: Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago,
and our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle
class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What happened?
And I still have to "press 1" for English
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 7:17:31 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#20. To: all (#3)
Good for Cryer, but I never understood why this government has never backfilled the flaw in their collection scheme. It seems easy enough; if there isn't a law, create one. Sorry for the pessimism on the dawn of such a powerful victory, but I have a good sense about the dogs we're dealing with.

Jethro Tull posted on 2007-07-12 7:43:03 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#21. To: Uncle Bill (#0)
In the words of the jury lady from Freedom to Fascism, "You mean we don't haaaaave to pay income taxes?"
............
onedollardvdproject.com
Three unique, Ron Paul video clips DVDs are now available on my site. FREEDOM TO FASCISM, the Illegals CD and the new montage DVDs of Ron Paul clips make a nice assortment of tools to help him get elected.
wakeup posted on 2007-07-12 7:48:45 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#22. To: wakeup (#21)
Things that make you go hmmmmmmm
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 7:58:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#23. To: Uncle Bill, christine (#22)
Ooooookay...so what happened to the jury in the Ed and Elaine Brown case? Come on, media...how come THIS guy is found innocent, and the Browns have to hide in their home, fearing for their lives? Something is WAY F***** up here...
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil posted on 2007-07-12 8:10:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#24. To: who knows what evil (#23)
We the people, are a nightmare as jurors on this issue. They just have to focus on the law, which doesn't exist, and FORCE judges to PRODUCE THE LAW, which they can't. The judges 99.9% of the time are a nightmare in these cases and are nothing but agents of the government protecting the IRS, which is nothing but a revenue collection agency for the international banking cabal, which is nothing but a multi-trillion dollar play toy for Satan to produce evil everywhere, enslave people, kill people, and destroy their soul.

QUESTION FOR RON PAUL: "Is there a law that requires people to complete a 1040?"
Library
Video
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 8:26:27 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#25. To: All (#24)
AUDIO: WTPRN - Guest: Gary Thomason discusses today's court victories of Tommy Cryer with his IRS case
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 8:38:43 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#26. To: who knows what evil, HOUNDDAWG, Critter, wake up (#23)
very good question! but i would think this bodes well for the Browns.

christine posted on 2007-07-12 8:58:42 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#27. To: Uncle Bill (#25)
Tommy Cryer will be on John Stadtmiller's show today on RBN 4-6 p.m. CT.

christine posted on 2007-07-12 9:00:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#28. To: christine, critter (#26)
very good question! but i would think this bodes well for the Browns.

Someone needs to get this info to them ASAP...we need equal application of the law here...the Browns shouldn't pay with their lives because the jury in New Hampshire didn't know their asses from a hole in the ground.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil posted on 2007-07-12 9:01:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#29. To: christine (#27)
Tommy Cryer will be on John Stadtmiller's show today on RBN 4-6 p.m. CT.

Tommy Cryer needs to hit the MAINSTREAM media, as well.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil posted on 2007-07-12 9:02:03 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#30. To: Uncle Bill (#25) (Edited)
Ed Brown was just interviewed on the Alex Jones show a few minutes ago, and he is already aware of the Cryer decision. He asked "Why was Mr. Cryer found innocent based on the same argument of 'show me the law' that we were convicted under?" Why, indeed.
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil posted on 2007-07-12 13:31:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#31. To: who knows what evil (#30)
"Ed Brown was just interviewed on the Alex Jones show a few minutes ago.."

Thanks. I'll go listen.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 16:57:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#32. To: Uncle Bill (#31)
Beginning of the second hour on the internet stream...Elaine, Randy Weaver, and Ed .
Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

who knows what evil posted on 2007-07-12 17:01:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#33. To: who knows what evil (#32)
Great, thanks.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 17:07:05 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#34. To: Uncle Bill (#9)
In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their government."

That is not the purpose of the income tax; it was established with the intent that it be used to pay the interest on the national debt, and it was never intended to do anything else. This is what has always been so confusing to people, esp. those who do not understand the disappearing money/credit of the federal reserve system!
Which also brings up another point; since the United States government does not print any 'money,' we are entirely at the mercy of the federal reserve for an operating medium of exchange. If the income tax goes away, everyone had better have a plan B in place as to how to live without any money in circulation.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:10:19 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#35. To: who knows what evil (#28)
we need equal application of the law here...

You know better than that! The Cryer case will NEVER be published and therefor the decision can not be used in other cares. Standard operating procedure for the Just-us system.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:12:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#36. To: Jethro Tull (#20)
but I have a good sense about the dogs we're dealing with.

You are correct, because the Cryer case will never be published.
if there isn't a law, create one. They can not. It is illegal, as long as they wish to keep the illusion of the Constitution around. This has been ruled on by the so-called Supreme Court, including rulings that say that the so-called income tax amendment changed nothing in the Constitution.
As I have posted before, and which the courts refuse to admit, is that the income tax is collected through and enforced by a contract. However, it is coming close to a time when the courts may be forced into a corner and have to admit the basis of the income tax.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:18:02 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#37. To: Uncle Bill (#19)
What happened?

You know what happened; Americans started believing it when someone from the government showed up and said, 'I am here to help you,' and the Americans started signing up for all of the 'free' stuff, like, for instance, Social Security.
From then on, it was katy bar the door!
In that respect, it is interesting to note that most of the people of Mèxico pay no to very few taxes; and, the people of Mèxico understand why not! Most of them have no direct connection to the federal government in Mèxico, i.e., no contracts.
More than 30 years ago, I read this;
"Two aspects of the Federal Income Tax system - voluntary compliance with the law and self-assessment of tax - make it important for you to understand your rights and responsibilities as a taxpayer. 'Voluntary compliance' places on the taxpayer the responsibility for filing an income tax return. You must decide whether the law requires you to file a return. If it does, you must file your return by the date it is due. IRS Publication 21."
After some further study, I choose to be out of the banking system, burned all of the tax records I had saved, and never went to work for someone else, except as a contract worker. I simply refused from that time on to put my 'label' on the income tax return. Oh, and I insulated myself from judgements. Been a pretty nice time since then.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:34:55 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#38. To: HOUNDDAWG (#15)
And, Red Beckman told me how he and Bill Benson researched the 16th amendment and proved it was never ratified. He said that when he provided the evidence to the 9th circuit, the judge said "This is a political matter on which we cannot rule!" and he ordered the steno not to make a transcript of the hearing!

The judge is correct, as it is a political matter, and the judge was hearing a contract case in the enforcement of the tax.
I have also met Red and Bill, read the book(s), and suggest that you research ALL of the amendments from the (now) 13th on, and you will find that NONE of them were lawfully ratified, as they apply only to the United States, and not to the several states of the union. In other words, they are applicable only to United States citizens.
The govt knows that it's a swindle, folks, believe me.
The difference is that the agents of the government understand the basis behind the tax, and we do not. It is not a swindle, it is simply dishonest not to make full disclosure so that people can make informed decisions. Which, of course, is why the truth is never discussed, because too many people would simply refuse to participate.
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:42:15 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#39. To: Uncle Bill (#7)
Click HERE to read this free copy

I would love to read that, but the link is dead!
When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or cease to be honest.
richard9151 posted on 2007-07-12 17:49:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#40. To: richard9151 (#39)
Tom Cryer's site is down due to unbelievable traffic volume, or the one world government banking cabal has shut it down. It will be back up though. His site, and that link were working fine last night.

"An act of the Congress of the United States ... which assumes powers ... not delegated by the Constitution, is not law, but is altogether void and of no force."
Thomas Jefferson: Draft Kentucky Resolutions, 1798. ME 17:383.

"Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function. ..challenging one of sovereignty’s fundamental principles: the ability to control what crosses borders in either direction. Globalisation thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary."
Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations(CFR), Sovereignty and globalisation

"The burden of debt is as destructive to freedom as subjugation by conquest."
Benjamin Franklin
SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE
On September 30, 1941, before the same Committee, Governor Eccles was asked by Representative Patman:
"How did you get the money to buy those two billion dollars worth of Government securities in 1933?
ECCLES: We created it.
MR. PATMAN: Out of what?
ECCLES: Out of the right to issue credit money.
MR. PATMAN: And there is nothing behind it, is there, except our Government’s credit?
ECCLES: That is what our money system is. If there were no debts in our money system, there wouldn’t be any money."
On June 17, 1942, Governor Eccles was interrogated by Mr. Dewey.
ECCLES: "I mean the Federal Reserve, when it carries out an open market operation, that is, if it purchases Government securities in the 167 open market, it puts new money into the hands of the banks which creates idle deposits.
DEWEY: There are no excess reserves to use for this purpose?
ECCLES: Whenever the Federal Reserve System buys Government securities in the open market, or buys them direct from the Treasury, either one, that is what it does.
DEWEY: What are you going to use to buy them with? You are going to create credit?
ECCLES: That is all we have ever done. That is the way the Federal Reserve System operates.
The Federal Reserve System creates money. It is a bank of issue."
At the House Hearing of 1947, Mr. Kolburn asked Mr. Eccles:
"What do you mean by monetization of the public debt?
ECCLES: I mean the bank creating money by the purchase of Government securities. All is created by debt--either private or public debt.
FLETCHER: Chairman Eccles, when do you think there is a possibility of returning to a free and open market, instead of this pegged and artificially controlled financial market we now have?
ECCLES: Never. Not in your lifetime or mine."
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 18:26:20 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#41. To: Government Shills (#40)
kisses and hugs.

"As of late we seem to be auditing only poor people," said IRS agent Jennifer Long. "The current IRS management does not believe anyone in this country can possibly live on less than $20,000 a year, insisting that anyone below that level must be cheating by understating their true income.

"Currently, in a typical case assigned for audit, there are no assets, no signs of wealth, no evidence that would support a suspicion of higher unreported income. So when the IRS does initiate an audit on these people, these individuals were already only one short step away from being on the street," Long continued.

"I can personally attest to the use of egregious tactics used by IRS revenue agents which are encouraged by members of the IRS management," Long said. "These tactics, which appear nowhere in the IRS manual, are used to extract unfairly assessed taxes from taxpayers, literally ruining families lives and businesses, all unnecessarily and sometimes illegally."
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 19:07:04 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#42. To: christine (#41)
Disregard subpoenas, Justice Dept. says
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 19:22:32 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#43. To: christine (#42)
BTTT
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 19:34:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#44. To: Uncle Bill (#41)
In 1968, Tax Protestor Gordon Kahl stopped filing IRS 1040 Income Tax Returns. For 9 years thereafter, the IRS ignored him, but in 1977 after Gordon Kahl spoke on an evening radio talk show regarding the illicitness of the income tax, some 250 phone calls would come into the radio station over the next two days; either supporting Kahl in some aspect, or pledging never to file another tax return.
And with that, the IRS came down on Kahl like a ton of bricks. They quickly assembled a case against him and two weeks later threw a criminal prosecution against him for violating Title 26, Section 7203 ["Willful Failure to File"]. Gordon Kahl was a low-income farmer not even meeting minimal statutory standards for threshold income levels achieved before being required to file 1040s, but that was not about to stop the IRS, who is good at changing the facts by creating facts.

murdering b*st*rds

christine posted on 2007-07-12 19:39:17 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#45. To: christine (#44)
Yep
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 19:53:08 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#46. To: christine (#44)
http://www.usdoj.gov/u sa o/law/news/wdl20061026.pdf

Hehehehehehehehehe
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 20:03:57 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#47. To: christine (#44)
Tom Cryer NOT GUILTY! IRS fails again

8-)
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 20:05:58 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#48. To: christine (#47)
Jury Poster
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 22:48:34 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#49. To: All (#48)
These news organizations aren't exactly fast. 8-)

Source

Jury acquits lawyer of evading taxes
A Shreveport lawyer accused of not paying federal income taxes has been acquitted by a federal trial jury.
The jury in U.S. District Court voted, 12-0, to find Tommy Cryer not guilty of failure to file income tax.
Prosecutors indicted him on tax evasion charges last October, saying he didn't pay $73,000 to the IRS in 2000 and 2001.
The issue involved a trust in which Cryer was the trustee and received dividends, interest and stock income. Prosecutors said Cryer concealed those sources of income by not filing a tax return on behalf of that trust.
Cryer maintained he reported all applicable income, and the jury agreed.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-12 22:54:03 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#50. To: Uncle Bill (#48)
unfortunately, most jurors are rocks.

christine posted on 2007-07-12 22:56:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#51. To: christine (#50)
That is the biggest fear for most that know the truth.
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-13 0:36:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#52. To: christine (#50)
Here's a nice, neat package. Tax Policy and the U.S. Constitution

"Those numbers are pie in the sky. The books are cooked routinely year after year,"
Franklin C. Spinney - Department of Defense Analyst. Discussing accounting gimmicks at the Pentagon. Source

Pentagon Missing 2.3 Trillion
Video – Interview with Karen Kwiatkowski
Press 1 for English, Press 2 for English, Press 3 for deportation
Death of Habeas Corpus: “Your words are lies, Sir.”
Uncle Bill posted on 2007-07-13 1:23:37 ET Reply Trace Private Reply

.
.
.
Comments (53 - 62) not displayed.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org

Remember...G-d saved more animals than people on the ark. www.siameserescue.org