Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Dead Constitution
See other Dead Constitution Articles

Title: GREAT VICTORY OVER IRS - Tom Cryer - The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax
Source: Liberty Post
URL Source: http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=193689
Published: Jul 12, 2007
Author: D Wornock
Post Date: 2007-07-12 00:17:47 by Uncle Bill
Keywords: Abolish, The, IRS
Views: 11236
Comments: 62

Today at about 5:30 PM Attorney Tom Cryer was found not guilty to all charges of willful failure to file by the jury in Federal District Court, Shreveport LA. I attended the 2-1/2 day trial. The judge assisted the prosecution in every way possible, and the prosecution lied claiming there is a law requiring most Americans to file. However, the jury saw through the lies and believed Tom Cryer.

The prosecution could not state any law making the average American liable for the income tax. All the prosecution could point out was rulings by two lower courts. However, as Tom Cryer stated The lower courts cannot overturn the Supreme Court and Tom Cryer stated numerous Supreme Court Ruling that conflicted with the IRS version of the law.

The Brilliant Tom Cryer:

Cryer’s strategy is to have the indictment dismissed on the merits of his constitutional and statutory arguments. He has filed an approximately 100-page motion that can be described in one word – “brilliant.”

UPDATES

How to Keep 100% of Your Earnings

America: From Freedom To Fascism

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#4. To: Uncle Bill (#0)

Now we can all stop paying our income taxes. Great! Spread the word!

RickyJ  posted on  2007-07-12   1:17:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#13. To: RickyJ (#4)

This is why people pay. Fear. That's all the federal goons have. Fear. The people fear the IRS. They fear corrupt judges(practically all). They fear ignorant and gullible jurors(most). The federal goons don't care about the law.

http://www.triallogs.com/

Tom Cryer Trial

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 04 July 2007

Tom Cryer’s trial is scheduled to take place on Monday, July 9, 2007, at 9:30 a.m., at the U. S. District Court, 300 Fannin St., Shreveport, Louisiana. They will be doing the preliminaries before the trial starts, so if you were there at 1:30 p.m., you would still be on time. They need your presence at this trial, they want to fill up the courtroom, please go early if you are able to go. Again, the preliminaries begin at 9:30 a.m., they are predicting the actual trial should get started somewhere around 1:30 p.m. Use your own judgment. In the event the courtroom is filled when you get there, please assemble outside the courtroom in a non-adversarial manner. We need to show respect, be courteous, quite, and attentive. We will endeavor to check with his office this Friday to confirm the trial is still scheduled to go forward.

Tom Cryer Trial - Day One

Written by djahn
Monday, 09 July 2007

Trial started today with the announcement that the DOJ wanted to abandon the two evasion charges, felonies, and prosecute instead on two counts of failure to file.

A jury was selected this afternoon. You never know whether you've done well or poorly until you get the outcome.

Tomorrow starts with evidence and the gov't should wrap up early in the day and then it's Mr Cryer's turn. He is ready to go. The only question remaining is how successful they will be in stopping him from telling the truth.

We'll convey more as it comes available.

Tom Cryer Trial - Day Two

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 11 July 2007

Here is an update we received from those in attendance. ###

Day Two started with the government presenting its case in the morning session and Tom taking the stand and offering his direct testimony until the close of yesterday's proceedings...

The government first brought an IRS supervisor to the stand... her testimony established the paperwork flow and indicated that Tommy filed "employer" documentation for his "employee" but did not file his individual returns.

Next was Tommy's secretary... she did not show up as a hostile witness towards the prosecution... but in the same breath, she did not give the government any help when she testified that she fills out all of her own IRS forms required of the employer, and even writes and signs most of the checks!

The DOJ tried to get in a point in that area... and she said that Tommy gave her the option to file or not-- then he abruptly stopped her... then on another question... she added that it was her choice to file even after she found out that there was no law making her liable-- where of course, he cut her off again.

The CPA took the stand and testified to profit and loss statements related to Tommy's practice of law... he simply established the numbers but never stated with authority to the lawful and legal definition of income... Larry was able to establish that the CPA had only a very insignificant understanding of the IRC.

The government's final witness was an IRS "special agent" in the Criminal Investigation Division who testified to the 'audits' of Tom's business and on Larry's cross-exam made it clear that the 'Code" is enormous and he only knew small bits and pieces of some of it... The IRS used Section 61 of the IRC to prop up its claim of liability to file and pay income taxes... but failed to clarify the first three words of Section 61... which state, "Unless otherwise provided..."

After lunch Tom took the stand...

There were some fireworks during Tom's testimony and the judge was clearly aggravated with the rule of law being presented in 'his' courtroom... and several times stopped Tom's testimony. One of those times the judge brought up the "Cheek" ruling where Larry and the judge went around and around on Tom's right to present his beliefs to the jury.

The judge overruled an objection of the prosecutor on another occasion but also warned Larry about the "very narrow" path he's taking the case and will not allow Tom to argue that the IRS is unconstitutional... which of course Tom never intended to do and has not done in the least.

Day Two ended with the judge calling counsel into the judge's chamber and unloading... venting his frustration mainly aimed at Larry and Tom taking over the courtroom and plowing ahead with getting the Internal Revenue Code... the Code of Federal Regs, the Constitution and a plethora of Supreme Court cases in front of the jury.

At the close of yesterday's hearing... the judge ordered Larry to turn over Tom's notes and research to the DOJ as the court believed that Tom's notebook filled with law and supporting Supreme Court cases was "discovery" and therefore the DOJ was entitled to it...

Larry quickly agreed to that and even told the court that it would be a very good thing for the prosecutor to read and urged the prosecutor to read it carefully and essentially looked forward to seeing more of it in the record and presented to the jury during cross-examination of Tom's beliefs.

Day three promises to be very interesting! The parties will meet prior to the start to discuss jury instructions before the jury is brought in and seated. The DOJ opens day three with cross-examination and Larry's re-direct may well occur before noon and closing arguments will surely take place before the close of today's proceedings...

Please let everyone know that http://www.truthattack.org will be providing you with exclusive MP3 audio interviews with Larry, Tommy (if possible) and attendees of the court proceedings and anyone else that I can get my microphone in front of today!

From: Bob Schulz
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 11:00 PM
To: Bob Hurt
Subject: [We The People] NOT GUILTY! Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ

NOT GUILTY!

July 11, 2007

Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ

According to our court-watcher we can tell you the following:

At the start of the trial the DOJ withdrew the felony charges, leaving two counts of willful failure to file.

The Constitution and the law were allowed into the courtroom. Although Cryer was able to tell the jury what he read, he was not allowed to show the jury what he read. Cryer was also able to tell the jury what he did not read in the law because he could not find it in the law - the law that made him liable to file and pay the federal income tax.

Tom did a good job of explaining to the jury what he read in the Brushhaber, Stanton and Eisner Supreme Court cases about the legal meaning of the word "income" and what he read in the Internal Revenue Code - everything but the law that required him to file. Tom had asked the IRS to show him the law that made him liable but the IRS did not respond.

Larry Becraft's closing arguments were "flawless."

Compared to the judges in the Simkanin and Schiff cases, Cryer's judge was "Cinderella."

Congratulations Tom and Larry. We are looking forward to your full report.

More details to follow on our website.

http://www.givemeliberty.org

Tom Cryer and Becraft Best the DOJ

Written by djahn
Wednesday, 11 July 2007

This update was reportedly distributed by We the People. I'm on a conference call right now. I'm fairly confident this report is accurate.

David Jahn

http://truthattack.org/

Uncle Bill  posted on  2007-07-12   3:36:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

Replies to Comment # 13.

#14. To: christine (#13)

WHY THE IRS AND INTERNATIONAL BANKERS ABSOLUTELY HATE THE INTERNET

Uncle Bill  posted on  2007-07-12 03:45:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

#62. To: Uncle Bill (#13)

Day Two ended with the judge calling counsel into the judge's chamber and unloading... venting his frustration mainly aimed at Larry and Tom taking over the courtroom and plowing ahead with getting the Internal Revenue Code... the Code of Federal Regs, the Constitution and a plethora of Supreme Court cases in front of the jury.

I found this to be extremely interesting, as the judge does not sit in a court of law, and HE KNOWS IT! I suspect you know, as I do, that he sits in a tribunal. I posted this the other day;

The Judiciary Act of 1789 September 24, 1789. SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the supreme court of the United States shall consist…

Now, we need to look at the Constitution; Article 3, Section 1:

“The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, …”

Since Congress was ordered to establish and clearly did establish the supreme court of the United States, as an inferior court, BECAUSE THE CONGRESS IS NOT COMMANDED TO ESTABLISH ANY OTHER COURT, the Supreme Court is an inferior court to the one supreme Court established by the Constitution. That court, the one supreme Court, has never sat. ...

... Clearly, the Senate and the Congress established the so-called Supreme Court of the United States, and what they create, they control. It should also be noted that the process of this court issues in the name of the President of the United States, rather than under it’s own authority, and this is because this court has no authority on it’s own; it is not the court detailed in Article 3 of the Constitution. It is an administrative court created by Congress.

Since that judge's so-called court answers to the so-called Supreme Court; it is the same type of court! The judge has a LOT of problems when law comes into the court! Made me laugh, it did!

richard9151  posted on  2007-07-14 00:53:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  

End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest