Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Paul Laffoley,member of design team of WTC, comments on 9/11
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC
Published: Apr 20, 2007
Author: Paul Laffoley Interview
Post Date: 2007-04-20 22:20:16 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 446264
Comments: 38

Click below for an excerpt from the Paul Laffoley interview.

http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC

Bio on Paul Laffoley

http://www.laffoleyarchive.com/laffoley_writings/bio_laffoley.html

LAFFOLEY ARCHIVE: Paul Laffoley Biographical Info CONDENSED BIOGRAPHY:

Laffoley attended Brown University, graduating in 1962 with honors in Classics, Philosophy, and Art History.

In 1963, he attended the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and apprenticed with the sculptor Mirko Basaldella before being dismissed from the institution. He was dismissed for "conceptual deviance", after the majority of his designs were given a grade that designates the project not as good or bad, but as 'currently technologically or physically impossible'.

Thereafter, he moved to New York to apprentice with the visionary architect Friedrich Kiesler. He was also hired for the design team of the World Trade Center, but was soon after fired by the chief architect, Minoru Yamasaki, for his unconventional ideas. He had apparently always been quite an 'unconventional' person. By Laffoley's account, he spoke his first word ("Constantinople") at the age of six months, and then lapsed into 4 years of silence, having been diagnosed with slight Autism. Laffoley has written that, in his senior year at Brown, he was given eight electric-shock treatments. As a child he attended the progressive Mary Lee Burbank School in Belmont, Massachusetts, where his draftsman's talent was ridiculed by his Abstract Expressionist teachers. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

#4. To: honway, Christine, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#0)

Sounds like a distracting piece of disinformation to me.

The building was perfect for controlled demolition, but that doesn't imply daddy or junior bin Laden. The dancing art students were Mossad.

(BAC is quiet on this one; take note.)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-21   12:48:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: SKYDRIFTER (#4)

disinformation

to all of you...paul laffoley is sincere...i'm the guy who interviewed him and he is my friend...

he is an extremely accomplished and visionary architect and artist who used to hang out with guys like buckminster fuller and WAS ON THE ORIGINAL WTC DESIGN TEAM UNDER MINORU YAMASAKI...he is considered an absolute polymath and genius by any who encounter him...i had no idea he had worked on the original wtc design team in the early 1960's until i interviewed him in february...i also had no intention of talking about 911 or anything like that...the program was focused on art, imagination and creativity...hah...but this little gem came out when we were talking about his background...

but i'll tell you this...he is for real and knows a great deal about the construction on the wtc comlpex...and we will be talking more about it in the near future...

o)<

mike

dragger2k  posted on  2007-04-25   18:49:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: dragger2k, honway, InsideJob (#5)

ping to dragger2k's post

christine  posted on  2007-04-25   18:55:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#7)

I'm going to take all of this with a large grain of salt.

Critter  posted on  2007-04-25   18:56:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Critter, SKYDRIFTER (#8)

Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition.

you don't think this is plausible?

christine  posted on  2007-04-25   19:23:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: Christine, Jethro Tull, Honway, Robin, Minerva, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#12)

Try to imagine an engineer involved in a great work - designed to be destroyed. That just doesn't pass the smell test.

The core columns, by coincidence, were a demolition expert's dream come true; but I can't believe that was the intent of the design.

Of course, we bring the bin Ladens into it, for authenticity!

If that had been the case, the towers would have come down in '93.

I smell Red Herring PSYOPS.


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-25   20:57:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: SKYDRIFTER (#24) (Edited)

Try to imagine an engineer involved in a great work - designed to be destroyed.

Any rational person would know that one day in the future the Towers would have to come down. No skyscaper has ever been built that will last forever.

A design taking into the consideration the absolute fact that one day the building will be coming down sounds plausible to me.

I am not suggesting and Paul Laffoley was not suggesting explosives were included in the design. Laffoley is making the claim that considerations were included in the design for the day that the building would come down.

Consider a scenario where due to an earthquake,hurricane or a design flaw a building the size of the Towers in downtown Manhattan was in imminent danger of toppling.

Time would be critical.

You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

honway  posted on  2007-04-25   21:10:50 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: honway (#26)

You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

Sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't want to base my case on the word of a guy with an extra-terrestrial metalic implant in his brain. hehehe

Critter  posted on  2007-04-25   21:13:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: Critter (#27)

Sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't want to base my case on the word of a guy with an extra-terrestrial metalic implant in his brain. h

People that were actually part of the design process and are willing to talk candidly are rare.

Just one more piece of a complex story.

Paul Laffoley provides directions for inquiry.

Was the WTC designed with considerations for demolition in the event of imminent uncontrolled collapse?

Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?

If either of these claims are true,there should be ways to independently verify the claims.

honway  posted on  2007-04-25   21:21:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: honway (#28)

Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?

Hmmmmm, that is an interesting question.

Critter  posted on  2007-04-25   21:24:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#34. To: Critter (#29)

Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?

Hmmmmm, that is an interesting question.

Osama bin Laden was a CIA creation.

Based on the history of the CIA, it does not appear that far fetched to consider the possibility that the bin Laden Company was a CIA creation, especially considering the close association of the Carlyle Group,Bush,Sr., and the bin Laden Company.

honway  posted on  2007-04-25   21:29:36 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#36. To: All (#34)

One of the biggest successes of the predecessor of the CIA was the formation of the insurance company that is now known as AIG. The company wrote policies in Europe which provided access to building plans and other intelligence that proved valuable in WWII. Now consider the intelligence value of a Middle Eastern construction firm building major projects through out the Middle East to the CIA.

BTW, AIG is still a front for the CIA. Magic bullet Spector placed Maurice Hank Greenberg,former long time CEO of AIG on the short list for Director of the CIA a few years ago. You have to ask yourself, how does running an insurance company qualify a man to be on the short list for CIA Director?

honway  posted on  2007-04-25   21:40:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 36.

        There are no replies to Comment # 36.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 36.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest