Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

9/11
See other 9/11 Articles

Title: Paul Laffoley,member of design team of WTC, comments on 9/11
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC
Published: Apr 20, 2007
Author: Paul Laffoley Interview
Post Date: 2007-04-20 22:20:16 by honway
Ping List: *9-11*     Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 446291
Comments: 38

Click below for an excerpt from the Paul Laffoley interview.

http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC

Bio on Paul Laffoley

http://www.laffoleyarchive.com/laffoley_writings/bio_laffoley.html

LAFFOLEY ARCHIVE: Paul Laffoley Biographical Info CONDENSED BIOGRAPHY:

Laffoley attended Brown University, graduating in 1962 with honors in Classics, Philosophy, and Art History.

In 1963, he attended the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and apprenticed with the sculptor Mirko Basaldella before being dismissed from the institution. He was dismissed for "conceptual deviance", after the majority of his designs were given a grade that designates the project not as good or bad, but as 'currently technologically or physically impossible'.

Thereafter, he moved to New York to apprentice with the visionary architect Friedrich Kiesler. He was also hired for the design team of the World Trade Center, but was soon after fired by the chief architect, Minoru Yamasaki, for his unconventional ideas. He had apparently always been quite an 'unconventional' person. By Laffoley's account, he spoke his first word ("Constantinople") at the age of six months, and then lapsed into 4 years of silence, having been diagnosed with slight Autism. Laffoley has written that, in his senior year at Brown, he was given eight electric-shock treatments. As a child he attended the progressive Mary Lee Burbank School in Belmont, Massachusetts, where his draftsman's talent was ridiculed by his Abstract Expressionist teachers. Subscribe to *9-11*

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#4. To: honway, Christine, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#0)

Sounds like a distracting piece of disinformation to me.

The building was perfect for controlled demolition, but that doesn't imply daddy or junior bin Laden. The dancing art students were Mossad.

(BAC is quiet on this one; take note.)


SKYDRIFTER  posted on  2007-04-21   12:48:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: SKYDRIFTER (#4)

disinformation

to all of you...paul laffoley is sincere...i'm the guy who interviewed him and he is my friend...

he is an extremely accomplished and visionary architect and artist who used to hang out with guys like buckminster fuller and WAS ON THE ORIGINAL WTC DESIGN TEAM UNDER MINORU YAMASAKI...he is considered an absolute polymath and genius by any who encounter him...i had no idea he had worked on the original wtc design team in the early 1960's until i interviewed him in february...i also had no intention of talking about 911 or anything like that...the program was focused on art, imagination and creativity...hah...but this little gem came out when we were talking about his background...

but i'll tell you this...he is for real and knows a great deal about the construction on the wtc comlpex...and we will be talking more about it in the near future...

o)<

mike

dragger2k  posted on  2007-04-25   18:49:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: dragger2k, honway, InsideJob (#5)

ping to dragger2k's post

christine  posted on  2007-04-25   18:55:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: christine (#7)

I'm going to take all of this with a large grain of salt.

Critter  posted on  2007-04-25   18:56:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Critter, SKYDRIFTER (#8)

Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition.

you don't think this is plausible?

christine  posted on  2007-04-25   19:23:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: christine, dragger2k (#12)

Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition.

you don't think this is plausible?

http://www.istructe.org/thestructuralengineer/HC/Abstract.asp?PID=4626

Report: Design for Demolition

Why design for demolition?

In the past, structural engineers have paid scant attention to the problems associated with the eventual demolition of their structures. The likely reasons for this are, perhaps, firstly, that the lifespans of traditional buildings have been so long and uncertain that the problem of demolition has had little immediacy at the design stage. Secondly, the client who commissions the construction of a building is often not the client who commissions its demolition; economic considerations are thus sharply separated. Thirdly, techniques for the demolition of traditional gravity structures are reasonably straightforward, requiring little or no engineering input.

P. Waldron and D.I. Blockley

honway  posted on  2007-04-25   20:40:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: honway, SKYDRIFTER (#20)

Why design for demolition?

most interesting

robin  posted on  2007-04-25   20:49:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: robin, honway, SKYDRIFTER (#22)

Recyclable skyscrapers? It makes sense on one level, but given the initial investment one would think these massive structures would be meant as at least a semi-permanent part of any city, it's not like we're talking about huge, billion dollar arenas or something. What about the postcard lobby, has anyone asked them how much they ate in out of date skyline shots?

Dakmar  posted on  2007-04-25   20:56:22 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

        There are no replies to Comment # 23.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest