4um: Paul Laffoley,member of design team of WTC, comments on 9/11

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
9/11
See other 9/11 Articles
Title: Paul Laffoley,member of design team of WTC, comments on 9/11
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC
Published: Apr 20, 2007
Author: Paul Laffoley Interview
Post Date: 2007-04-20 22:20:16 by honway
Ping List: *9-11* Subscribe to *9-11*
Keywords: None
Views: 446184
Comments: 38

Click below for an excerpt from the Paul Laffoley interview.
http://media.putfile.com/Paul-Laffoley-WTC

Bio on Paul Laffoley
http://www.laffoleyarchive.com/laffoley_writings/bio_laffoley.html
LAFFOLEY ARCHIVE: Paul Laffoley Biographical Info CONDENSED BIOGRAPHY:
Laffoley attended Brown University, graduating in 1962 with honors in Classics, Philosophy, and Art History.
In 1963, he attended the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and apprenticed with the sculptor Mirko Basaldella before being dismissed from the institution. He was dismissed for "conceptual deviance", after the majority of his designs were given a grade that designates the project not as good or bad, but as 'currently technologically or physically impossible'.
Thereafter, he moved to New York to apprentice with the visionary architect Friedrich Kiesler. He was also hired for the design team of the World Trade Center, but was soon after fired by the chief architect, Minoru Yamasaki, for his unconventional ideas. He had apparently always been quite an 'unconventional' person. By Laffoley's account, he spoke his first word ("Constantinople") at the age of six months, and then lapsed into 4 years of silence, having been diagnosed with slight Autism. Laffoley has written that, in his senior year at Brown, he was given eight electric-shock treatments. As a child he attended the progressive Mary Lee Burbank School in Belmont, Massachusetts, where his draftsman's talent was ridiculed by his Abstract Expressionist teachers. Subscribe to *9-11*
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: All (#0)
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=7868
From Micpsi:
Paul Laffoley, one of the architects who worked for Emery Roth & Sons, one of the architectual firms that designed the WTC, dropped a bombshell during an interview on February 21, 2007 with Mike Hagan on Radio Orbit. Evidently, very few heard the sound of the bomb going off, and so I offer it here so that it may blow away your minds. About 40 minutes into the interview, he says that, when he started working with Roth on the design of floors 15-45 of WTC2, Saudi Arabian engineers were there who had been brought over by the chief architect of WTC to New York from the Bin Laden Construction Company in order to collaborate with his firm. Some of them asked him where he would put demolition devices. Evidently, these sites were designed into the towers! Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition. Then he asserted that WTC1, WTC2 & WTC7 were in fact brought down by controlled demolition on 9/11! He seemed to think that the terrorists could have done this because the Bin Laden Construction Company would have known the location of the special places designed for explosives to be placed.
We may excuse Laffoley's naivety for thinking - contrary to the official story - that al Qaeda terrorists blew up the towers. The crucial point is that he said categorically that the towers at WTC had been designed to be brought down by controlled demolition with the provision of strategic points built into the towers, where demolition charges would be placed once the decision was taken to blow them up. As an architect who helped design WTC2, he is a credible source, and his statement cannot be lightly dismissed as disinformation, for whoever destroyed the towers on 91/11 would hardly want him revealing publicly that the towers had been designed to be demolished eventually. His revelation has enormous implications, of course, for the plausibility of the towers being destroyed by some unconventional form of controlled demolition.
Hear the interview at: http://www.mikehagan.com/2012/mp3/021207_PAUL_LAFFOLEY.mp3
There is a blogger's article that comments on this interview at: http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2007...any-worked.html
Laffoley's statement about the towers being designed for controlled demolition occurs around 40-45 minutes into the interview.

honway posted on 2007-04-20 22:24:17 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#2. To: honway (#1)
Paul Laffoley, one of the architects who worked for Emery Roth & Sons, one of the architectual firms that designed the WTC, dropped a bombshell during an interview on February 21, 2007 with Mike Hagan on Radio Orbit. Evidently, very few heard the sound of the bomb going off, and so I offer it here so that it may blow away your minds. About 40 minutes into the interview, he says that, when he started working with Roth on the design of floors 15-45 of WTC2, Saudi Arabian engineers were there who had been brought over by the chief architect of WTC to New York from the Bin Laden Construction Company in order to collaborate with his firm. Some of them asked him where he would put demolition devices. Evidently, these sites were designed into the towers! Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition. Then he asserted that WTC1, WTC2 & WTC7 were in fact brought down by controlled demolition on 9/11! He seemed to think that the terrorists could have done this because the Bin Laden Construction Company would have known the location of the special places designed for explosives to be placed.

Whoa. Wow. Just.... wow...
Gold and silver are real money, paper is but a promise.

Elliott Jackalope posted on 2007-04-20 22:51:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#3. To: Elliott Jackalope (#2)

Holy shit!!!!
formerly GJones.
InsideJob posted on 2007-04-21 7:09:37 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#4. To: honway, Christine, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#0)
Sounds like a distracting piece of disinformation to me.
The building was perfect for controlled demolition, but that doesn't imply daddy or junior bin Laden. The dancing art students were Mossad.
(BAC is quiet on this one; take note.)

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-04-21 12:48:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#5. To: SKYDRIFTER (#4)
disinformation

to all of you...paul laffoley is sincere...i'm the guy who interviewed him and he is my friend...
he is an extremely accomplished and visionary architect and artist who used to hang out with guys like buckminster fuller and WAS ON THE ORIGINAL WTC DESIGN TEAM UNDER MINORU YAMASAKI...he is considered an absolute polymath and genius by any who encounter him...i had no idea he had worked on the original wtc design team in the early 1960's until i interviewed him in february...i also had no intention of talking about 911 or anything like that...the program was focused on art, imagination and creativity...hah...but this little gem came out when we were talking about his background...
but i'll tell you this...he is for real and knows a great deal about the construction on the wtc comlpex...and we will be talking more about it in the near future...
o)<
mike

dragger2k posted on 2007-04-25 18:49:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#6. To: dragger2k (#5)
thanks for the information, Mike, and welcome to 4.

christine posted on 2007-04-25 18:53:44 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#7. To: dragger2k, honway, InsideJob (#5)
ping to dragger2k's post

christine posted on 2007-04-25 18:55:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#8. To: christine (#7)
I'm going to take all of this with a large grain of salt.
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
Critter posted on 2007-04-25 18:56:37 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#9. To: SKYDRIFTER (#4)
duly noted
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
robin posted on 2007-04-25 19:05:27 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#10. To: honway, Christine, Aristeides, Robin, Diana, All (#0)
I don't trust this one; I think I smell Red Herring.

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-04-25 19:07:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#11. To: honway, ALL (#1)
About 40 minutes into the interview, he says that, when he started working with Roth on the design of floors 15-45 of WTC2, Saudi Arabian engineers were there who had been brought over by the chief architect of WTC to New York from the Bin Laden Construction Company in order to collaborate with his firm. Some of them asked him where he would put demolition devices.

So you think the Saudi's planned 9/11 in 1963 or 1964?
The CT community just gets nuttier and nuttier.

The crucial point is that he said categorically that the towers at WTC had been designed to be brought down by controlled demolition with the provision of strategic points built into the towers, where demolition charges would be placed once the decision was taken to blow them up.

You do realize this is utter nonsense and that your leg is being pulled. Don't you, honway? This guy is somewhat of a nut. http://www.laffoley.com/ ROTFLOL!
One of his pieces of work:

Another of his interviews:
http://www.disinfo.com/archive/pages/multimedia/id535/pg1/index.html "This Infinity Factory interview (May 25, 1999) with artist and alchemist Paul Laffoley focuses on his plans for a working time machine.
---------------------------------------------------------
Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.
BeAChooser posted on 2007-04-25 19:22:32 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#12. To: Critter, SKYDRIFTER (#8)
Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition.

you don't think this is plausible?

christine posted on 2007-04-25 19:23:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#13. To: BeAChooser (#11) (Edited)
You do realize this is utter nonsense and that your leg is being pulled. Don't you, honway? This guy is somewhat of a nut. http://www.laffoley.com/ ROTFLOL!

Just because you don't understand Laffoley's graphic doesn't mean he's crazy, BAC. Within that complex web of spatial relationships may lie the answer and cure to your reflexive Bushbotism and continued denial of reality. Study it. Ponder it. Who can guess at the power hidden within it? Delving into its mysteries ever deeper might just be the only chance you'll have to escape the mental prison that binds you in darkness. ;^)
Check out my blog, America, the Bushieful.
Arator posted on 2007-04-25 20:09:54 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#14. To: dragger2k (#5) (Edited)
but i'll tell you this...he is for real and knows a great deal about the construction on the wtc comlpex...and we will be talking more about it in the near future...

Thanks for the ground-breaking interview and I appreciate your participation on freedom4um. There are a great many folks here who have been taking a close look at 9/11 for over five years.
We also have one 911 debunker
http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=50759
'"911 debunkers---those deaf, dumb and blind (to logic, physics and evidence) accessories to a crime---spend far more time attacking those of us in the 911 Truth Movement than seeking either truth or justice. Far easier for these sad and misguided citizens to accept the Big Lie of 911 than stare into the harsh light and accept the fact that when they defend the "official story" they defend liars, incompetents, embezzlers, war criminals, poisoners and torturers."

honway posted on 2007-04-25 20:16:13 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#15. To: BeAChooser (#11)

''the messianic side of Americans can be tiresome.'' - Nicolas Sarkozy
Dakmar posted on 2007-04-25 20:21:11 ET (1 image) Reply Trace Private Reply
#16. To: christine (#12)
you don't think this is plausible?

Not really.
And if they REALLY wanted to prewire it for demo, would they ask an insignificant draftsperson?
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
Critter posted on 2007-04-25 20:23:35 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#17. To: honway, dragger2k, ALL (#14)
We also have one 911 debunker http://freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=50759

From laffoley's own archive:
***********
http://www.laffoleyarchive.com/laffoley_writings/bio_laffoley.html
... snip ...
In 1963, he attended the Harvard Graduate School of Design, and apprenticed with the sculptor Mirko Basaldella before being dismissed from the institution. He was dismissed for "conceptual deviance"
... snip ...
Thereafter, he moved to New York to apprentice with the visionary architect Friedrich Kiesler. He was also hired for the design team of the World Trade Center, but was soon after fired by the chief architect, Minoru Yamasaki, for his unconventional ideas.
... snip ...
In 1965, he completed the first paintings of a mature style in the household basement against the wishes of his father. Christmas (1968), after a quarrel with a first studio partner, Laffoley was in immediate need of a studio and living accommodations. Having only one day to relocate ...
... snip ...
In 2006 the property management company discovered that Paul was living in this space which is not zoned for habitation. He was sued for eviction but the court case was dropped during a series of sublimely synchronistic events.
During a CAT scan of his head in 1992, a cylindrical piece of metal 3/8 of an inch long was discovered symmetrically lodged in Paul's brain. It is in the exact middle of his head, in the occipital lobe of his brain, near the pineal gland. The CAT scan was advised by his dentist, after noticing something unusual in a routine x-ray before a root-canal. The dental technician asked Laffoley "Uh ... Sir, have you ever been shot in the head?" Local Mutual UFO Network investigators declared it to be "an alien nanotechnological laboratory." Laffoley has come to believe that the "implant" is extraterrestrial in origin and is the main motivation behind his ideas and theories.
************
Not only is he nutty, but apparently he has trouble getting along with people. But you folks go ahead and believe he's not delusional about what happened over 40 years ago. ROTFLOL!
---------------------------------------------------------
Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.
BeAChooser posted on 2007-04-25 20:31:31 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#18. To: Arator (#13) (Edited)
You ever wonder if geniuses are just psycohpaths given a nurturing environment?
Wow, that didn't come out right, but what I meant to ask is there a similarity between the compulsive behavior it takes to spend hour after hour on these complex puzzles. It seems the killer type prefers language puzzles while the true pusharound dorks are into math and hard sciences.
''the messianic side of Americans can be tiresome.'' - Nicolas Sarkozy
Dakmar posted on 2007-04-25 20:31:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#19. To: Dakmar (#18)
You ever wonder if geniuses are just psychopaths given a nurturing environment?

I like that, it's backwards but it works.
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
robin posted on 2007-04-25 20:39:18 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#20. To: christine, dragger2k (#12)
Laffoley said that buildings in the early 1960s and 1970s in New York were built to be brought down by controlled demolition.
you don't think this is plausible?

http://www.istructe.org/thestructuralengineer/HC/Abstract.asp?PID=4626
Report: Design for Demolition
Why design for demolition?
In the past, structural engineers have paid scant attention to the problems associated with the eventual demolition of their structures. The likely reasons for this are, perhaps, firstly, that the lifespans of traditional buildings have been so long and uncertain that the problem of demolition has had little immediacy at the design stage. Secondly, the client who commissions the construction of a building is often not the client who commissions its demolition; economic considerations are thus sharply separated. Thirdly, techniques for the demolition of traditional gravity structures are reasonably straightforward, requiring little or no engineering input.
P. Waldron and D.I. Blockley

honway posted on 2007-04-25 20:40:26 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#21. To: All (#20)
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn1281
Classic demolition
The collapse of the WTC towers looked like a classic controlled demolition, said Mike Taylor of the National Association of Demolition Contractors in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.
"If there's any good thing about this it's that the towers tended not to weaken to one side," said Taylor. "They could have tipped onto other buildings or into the river across the West Side highway."
The collapse of the WTC towers mirrored the strategy used by demolition experts. In controlled demolitions, explosives are placed not just on the lowest three floors but also on several consecutive floors about a third of the way up the building.
The explosions at the higher floors enable the collapse to gain downward momentum as gravity pulls the full weight of unsupported higher floors down into lower floors in a snowballing effect.
On Tuesday, the impacts of aeroplanes on the higher floors replaced the explosives. The collapse of the higher floors caused the floors below to be crushed. "It cascaded down like an implosion," says Taylor.
The lack of collapse in higher stories was one reason why the 454 kilogram bomb detonated in the underground garage of the World Trade Center in 1993 failed to destroy the building.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 20:48:56 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#22. To: honway, SKYDRIFTER (#20)
Why design for demolition?

most interesting
"The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes nor between parties either — but right through the human heart." — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
robin posted on 2007-04-25 20:49:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#23. To: robin, honway, SKYDRIFTER (#22)
Recyclable skyscrapers? It makes sense on one level, but given the initial investment one would think these massive structures would be meant as at least a semi-permanent part of any city, it's not like we're talking about huge, billion dollar arenas or something. What about the postcard lobby, has anyone asked them how much they ate in out of date skyline shots?
''the messianic side of Americans can be tiresome.'' - Nicolas Sarkozy
Dakmar posted on 2007-04-25 20:56:22 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#24. To: Christine, Jethro Tull, Honway, Robin, Minerva, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#12)
Try to imagine an engineer involved in a great work - designed to be destroyed. That just doesn't pass the smell test.
The core columns, by coincidence, were a demolition expert's dream come true; but I can't believe that was the intent of the design.
Of course, we bring the bin Ladens into it, for authenticity!
If that had been the case, the towers would have come down in '93.
I smell Red Herring PSYOPS.

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-04-25 20:57:04 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#25. To: robin (#22)
http://www.rense.com/general47/pulled.htm

Comment From Tom-Scott Gordon 1-19-4
Hi Jeff -
You may remember the transcript that I sent you about a pre-existing 'demolition plan' for the Twin Trade Towers. I have been actively pursuing the development of that set of documents into a 'corroborated' story. I have received help from Michael @ From the Wilderness and Jeff King, another important 9-11 cover-up researcher. I think you should have one of them on your program immediately!
I would like for you to 'add this comment' to the end of your story, something that I believe to be just as important as Mr. Silverstein's 'smoking gun,' -itself. This appears in the context of my tedious narrative, and in some ways 'certifies,' these events. I will highlight the quote now, but my full story will not be ready to send to the commission for days.
It's more than a smoking gun. In my 25+ years exposure to all sorts of architects, I have never heard such a damaging comment as the one I'm about to tell you. Not to the design process, the people, nor the conflicts involved in achieving our profession's crowning achievements. It was like seeing a mother with her newborn child, as she quietly ends it's precious life!
"There I was, fantastically excited to be looking down on the steel framing, as Building #7 was finally 'topped out.' To my right, stood one of the project architects, who said; (then turned, and left the room without looking any of us in the eye): "Building seven. -The building that never should have been built."

honway posted on 2007-04-25 20:58:58 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#26. To: SKYDRIFTER (#24) (Edited)
Try to imagine an engineer involved in a great work - designed to be destroyed.

Any rational person would know that one day in the future the Towers would have to come down. No skyscaper has ever been built that will last forever.
A design taking into the consideration the absolute fact that one day the building will be coming down sounds plausible to me.

I am not suggesting and Paul Laffoley was not suggesting explosives were included in the design. Laffoley is making the claim that considerations were included in the design for the day that the building would come down.
Consider a scenario where due to an earthquake,hurricane or a design flaw a building the size of the Towers in downtown Manhattan was in imminent danger of toppling.
Time would be critical.
You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:10:50 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#27. To: honway (#26)
You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

Sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't want to base my case on the word of a guy with an extra-terrestrial metalic implant in his brain. hehehe
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
Critter posted on 2007-04-25 21:13:12 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#28. To: Critter (#27)
Sounds reasonable, but I wouldn't want to base my case on the word of a guy with an extra-terrestrial metalic implant in his brain. h

People that were actually part of the design process and are willing to talk candidly are rare.
Just one more piece of a complex story.
Paul Laffoley provides directions for inquiry.
Was the WTC designed with considerations for demolition in the event of imminent uncontrolled collapse?
Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?
If either of these claims are true,there should be ways to independently verify the claims.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:21:23 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#29. To: honway (#28)
Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?

Hmmmmm, that is an interesting question.
A new truth movement friendly digg type site: Zlonk it!
Critter posted on 2007-04-25 21:24:10 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#30. To: Critter (#27)
but I wouldn't want to base my case on the word of a guy with an extra-terrestrial metalic implant in his brain. hehehe

I listen to people all the time that believe a guy living in a cave in Afghanistan and 19 misfits carried out one of the most successful military attacks in human history on the most powerful nation the world has ever known. That attack changed the world.
I have a high tolerance for nonsense.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:26:14 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#31. To: SKYDRIFTER (#24)
Of course, we bring the bin Ladens into it, for authenticity!

that part i don't buy either.

christine posted on 2007-04-25 21:26:30 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#32. To: honway (#26)
You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

i agree

christine posted on 2007-04-25 21:28:49 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#33. To: Critter (#27)
Pick and choose, man. One of the smartest people I've ever met had a metal plate as part of his skull.
''the messianic side of Americans can be tiresome.'' - Nicolas Sarkozy
Dakmar posted on 2007-04-25 21:28:59 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#34. To: Critter (#29)
Was the bin Laden Company in anyway connected to the construction of the WTC?
Hmmmmm, that is an interesting question.

Osama bin Laden was a CIA creation.
Based on the history of the CIA, it does not appear that far fetched to consider the possibility that the bin Laden Company was a CIA creation, especially considering the close association of the Carlyle Group,Bush,Sr., and the bin Laden Company.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:29:36 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#35. To: honway, Christine, Robin, Aristeides, Red Jones, Diana, Kamala, All (#26)

You can make the case that a design which included the ability to rapidly prepare the building for demolition would be the responsible thing to do.

That's carrying rationalization way over the line, for my money.

I just don't buy it. That would entail the addition of 'weak points' in a building that was economically designed to be maximum strength, per ton of steel. You can't have both.

SKYDRIFTER posted on 2007-04-25 21:33:00 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#36. To: All (#34)
One of the biggest successes of the predecessor of the CIA was the formation of the insurance company that is now known as AIG. The company wrote policies in Europe which provided access to building plans and other intelligence that proved valuable in WWII. Now consider the intelligence value of a Middle Eastern construction firm building major projects through out the Middle East to the CIA.
BTW, AIG is still a front for the CIA. Magic bullet Spector placed Maurice Hank Greenberg,former long time CEO of AIG on the short list for Director of the CIA a few years ago. You have to ask yourself, how does running an insurance company qualify a man to be on the short list for CIA Director?

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:40:09 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#37. To: SKYDRIFTER (#35)
I just don't buy it. That would entail the addition of 'weak points' in a building that was economically designed to be maximum strength, per ton of steel. You can't have both.

No one would intentionally design weak points.
I believe the practice of designing for demolition means identifying in advance the key load bearing points and identifying those points in the structure and on blueprints.
This is only speculation, but if you wanted the ability to do it quickly to prevent a toppling collapse in Manhattan and a potential domino event,the building might be pre-wired. Hence, the only additional component needed in the event of imminent collapse would be to place the pre-determined explosives at the pre-determined locations.

honway posted on 2007-04-25 21:48:33 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
#38. To: honway, ALL (#28)
From post #21 - The collapse of the WTC towers looked like a classic controlled demolition, said Mike Taylor of the National Association of Demolition Contractors in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.

Just so your readers don't get the wrong idea, neither Mike Taylor or the National Demolition Association thinks bombs brought down the towers. Nor has even ONE of the roughly 1000 firms and 20000 workers in the industry said they did. A great conspiracy?

From post #25 - Jeff King, another important 9-11 cover-up researcher.

According to Jeff (http://www.plaguepuppy.net/public_html/letters/), he spent his first 2 years at MIT as a math major then work for small electronics manufacturer before going back to complete a dual major in Electrical Engineering and Biology. After graduating from MIT in 1974, he went to med school at UVM in Vermont, then spent a year at the Harvard School of Public Health in the Pulmonary Physiology lab doing electrical and mechanical engineering work before deciding to do an internship and practice clinical medicine. For the past 25 years he has been employed as a family physician ... NOT an engineer ... of any sort. In fact, at the above source (which is, by the way, his own very K**KY conspiracy website), you can see him state that "the "MIT Engineer" caption on the video was not my doing". Now he (and you) may think that what he learned 30 years ago about electrons qualifies him as an expert on analyses and behavior that REAL structural engineers and demolition experts spend years and years to acquire, but he's only fooling himself.

From post #28 - Paul Laffoley provides directions for inquiry.

ROTFLOL!
---------------------------------------------------------
Aren't you lucky. You get to receive one of the 15 posts I'm allowed each day.
BeAChooser posted on 2007-04-25 21:56:38 ET Reply Trace Private Reply
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

Freedom4um