Freedom4um

Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

National News
See other National News Articles

Title: Here’s how candidates for governor reacted to the arrest in ‘stand your ground’ shooting
Source: [None]
URL Source: http://www.tampabay.com/florida-pol ... in-stand-your-ground-shooting/
Published: Aug 13, 2018
Author: Emily L. Mahoney
Post Date: 2018-08-13 17:53:56 by BTP Holdings
Keywords: None
Views: 151
Comments: 26

Here’s how candidates for governor reacted to the arrest in ‘stand your ground’ shooting

The Clearwater shooting has become highly politicized.

LUIS SANTANA | Times Family and friends of Markeis McGlockton, the 28 year old man that was shot and killed during a parking lot altercation in front of his children gathered in front of the location where he was shot. The shooter was not arrested because authorities said it fell within the criteria of Florida's "stand your ground" self-defense law. Protesters gathered to voice their concerns and seek an arrest in the case. [Sunday July 22, 2018] [Photo Luis Santana | Times]

By Emily L. Mahoney 3 hours ago

The shooter in Florida's latest, high-profile "stand your ground" shooting was arrested on Monday and charged with manslaughter, sparking immediate reaction from those running to be Florida's next governor.

Michael Drejka, 48, was booked into the Pinellas County Jail, where he will be held in lieu of $100,000 bail, according to the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office. Drejka was not immediately arrested after he shot 28-year-old Markeis McGlockton on July 19 because of the controversial self-defense law, called "Stand Your Ground," that eliminated one's duty to retreat before resorting to force.

The case has drawn the national spotlight and renewed debate over racial injustice and the controversial law. Drejka, the shooter, is white and McGlockton was black.

The two Republican candidates for governor, Ron DeSantis and Adam Putnam, got into a nasty disagreement over the case that started on Twitter and then spilled into last week's debate in Jacksonville. DeSantis said that Pinellas County Sheriff Bob Gualtieri had not "analyzed the law properly" in his decision to apply the "Stand Your Ground" law in this case, and Putnam accused him of improperly criticizing law enforcement and "siding" with Democrats.

Democrats universally celebrated the arrest and some renewed calls for a repeal of "Stand Your Ground." National civil rights leader Rev. Al Sharpton, who visited Clearwater after the shooting, said in a statement on Monday that the arrest is a "ray of hope," while the state law is "an abomination" that allows "vigilante justice that consistently provides cover to racists and bigots for murdering innocent Black Americans."

Here are the candidates' reactions, all provided via statements, unless otherwise noted:

Republicans:

Adam Putnam: "I support the State Attorney's decision. The process worked."

Ron DeSantis: His campaign has not yet responded to a request for comment. This post will be updated if a statement is received. Democrats:

Andrew Gillum: "I'm relieved Markeis McGlockton's family and the people of Clearwater will be heard in this horrific tragedy. … However, Stand Your Ground still created the environment where the shooter believed he had a legal right to murder Markeis McGlockton. I again call on Governor Rick Scott to declare a state of emergency and suspend this law before someone else gets hurt or killed."

Gwen Graham: "Today's decision to charge Michael Drejka is a step toward justice for Markeis McGlockton — but it also exposes the fatal issues with Florida's Stand Your Ground law. … As Governor, I will lead an effort to repeal the law and examine legislation that protects those who are legitimately defending themselves, without creating a legal loophole for criminal behavior. I will also create a task force of prosecutors, community and civil rights leaders to take a look at every self-defense case where a death occurs to ensure that the law isn't allowing criminals to slip through the cracks."

Jeff Greene: "Today's (delayed) decision to arrest and charge Michael Drejka means justice may finally be served in the senseless killing of Markeis McGlockton. I am proud that our voices and calls to action made a difference here – but the fact remains that an innocent, unarmed father was shot to death in front of his children in the middle of the afternoon. Stand Your Ground is legalized murder. It must be repealed."

Chris King: "The state attorney's office is doing what Sheriff Gualtieri has failed to do thus far –– seeking justice for the death of Markeis McGlockton. This community is crying out for action and the McGlockton family deserves justice, and that's why I've been calling for leaders to act since this tragedy occurred. Today's decision is another example why Florida's broken 'stand your ground' law must be repealed so that justice in this case and every other tragedy can never be delayed or denied."

Philip Levine, who spoke to a Times reporter at an event in Tampa: "(The arrest is) a first step in the right direction. I'm surprised it took that long. I think the Sheriff was wrong in not arresting him immediately on the scene because clearly there was probable cause. I'm not a lawyer, but based on what I saw, he should've been arrested there instantly."


Poster Comment:

From what I can tell from this incident, it seems the black man, Marquis McGlockton, was not armed. When he noticed the argument taking place he pushed the other man to the ground. Since McGlockton was not armed, Michael Drejka made a serious error to shoot and kill him. He clearly used excessive force in this case.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

#2. To: BTP Holdings (#0)

I looked at the video again today. There's no question whatsoever that McGlockton (the black guy who was killed) assaulted Drejka and quite strongly at that by manhandling him down to the pavement. However, at the moment Drejka fired, McGlockton had already retreated and was in fact continuing to do so.

I don't know if even a cop could wiggle out of this one. I think Drejka used excessive force when he pulled the trigger. Had he fired sooner before McGlockton retreated, he might have been excused. But as far as the law goes, given the security vid, I think the odds are stacked against him in court.

If the Sheriff had recommended charges, this certainly would not have been such a politicized issue that puts the "Stand Your Ground" doctrine itself on trial. What's really needed in court is a comparison between a cop shooting someone in this type situation and a citizen doing it. Cops always get more leeway, and unconstitutionally so.

Pinguinite  posted on  2018-08-13   19:02:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Pinguinite (#2)

Seldom a smart thing to shoot when someone's retreating.

Stand your ground is a good law, it should not be brought into this case.

Lod  posted on  2018-08-13   19:18:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Lod (#3)

Seldom a smart thing to shoot when someone's retreating.

Stand your ground is a good law, it should not be brought into this case.

You're right on the first assertion for sure. This fella was known to brandish a firearm in other conflict situations although I've found it hard to find a solid account of any of these encounters. We're certain to hear more on these stories come down the pipe in coming days. I'm still looking to see what's been posted on it.

In any case, this case provides a lesson which reminds us that when going about armed, it's always good to pick our battles. Whereas I might gently remind someone parked without a placard in a handicap, I'd most probably let it go even if I weren't packing. If I was carrying heat, I'd walk away from that no mistake.

Your second comment is interesting and it looks likely that this law will be cited in this case. For good or ill, the coming trial could well be a test case that shows what the limits of "stand your ground" is. In Florida in any case.

randge  posted on  2018-08-14   19:45:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: randge (#21)

In any case, this case provides a lesson which reminds us that when going about armed, it's always good to pick our battles. Whereas I might gently remind someone parked without a placard in a handicap, I'd most probably let it go even if I weren't packing. If I was carrying heat, I'd walk away from that no mistake.

Excellent point. I was looking at this story as a case where a curmudgeon old prick was hassling some ghetto rats and got whipped in the "whose is bigger" contest. All true, up to that point, but you are correct, he has a responsibility to not provoke confrontation when he is armed.

Dakmar  posted on  2018-08-14   23:18:51 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 23.

#25. To: Dakmar (#23)

. . . a case where a curmudgeon old prick was hassling some ghetto rats and got whipped in the "whose is bigger" contest.

ROFLOL!

Gotta linky on that one?

randge  posted on  2018-08-15 15:13:16 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 23.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest