Murray is a heavy-hitter in the alternative media with huge credibility. The former UK ambassador and ally of Julian Assange writes mostly for his personal blog, which averages about 1.5 million views per month, an astonishing amount, eclipsing most mainstream pundits. Obviously people appreciate what he has to say. Facebook doesn't. On April 23rd, the great independent investigative journalist, Craig Murray a former British diplomat headlined at his blog, "Condemned By Their Own Words, and he posted there the translated-to-English transcript (excerpted below) to this Israeli radio Hebrew broadcast on April 21st, in which an Israeli Brigadier-General, named Fogel, explained why Israels troops are doing the right thing to shoot and even to kill Gazans who come (an unspecified) too close to the wall which separates Israel from Gaza:
Any person who gets close to the fence, anyone who could be a future threat to the border of the State of Israel and its residents, should bear a price for that violation. If this child or anyone else gets close to the fence in order [the soldier thinks possibly] to hide an explosive device or [to] check if there are any dead zones there or to cut the fence so someone could infiltrate the territory of the State of Israel to kill us
Nesiel [the interviewer]: Then, then his punishment [for being suspected] is death?
Fogel: His punishment is death. As far as Im concerned then yes, if you can only shoot him to stop him, in the leg or arm great. But if its more than that then, yes, you want to check with me whose blood is thicker, ours or theirs. It is clear to you that if one such person will manage to cross the fence or hide an explosive device there
Nesiel: But we were taught that live fire is only used when the soldiers face immediate danger.
It does not do all that well for us, those pictures that are distributed around the world.
Fogel: Look, Ron, were even terrible at it [at suppressing those pictures]. Theres nothing to be done, David always looks better against Goliath. And in this case, we are the Goliath. Not the David. That is entirely clear to me.
It will drag us into a war. I do not want to be on the side that gets dragged. I want to be on the side that initiates things. I do not want to wait for the moment where it finds a weak spot and attacks me there. If tomorrow morning it gets into a military base or a kibbutz and kills people there and takes prisoners of war or hostages, call it as you like, were in a whole new script. I want the leaders of Hamas to wake up tomorrow morning and for the last time in their life see the smiling faces of the IDF [Israels army]. Thats what I want to have happen. But we are dragged along. So were putting snipers up because we want to preserve the values we were educated by [that Israels soldiers are jury, judge, and even executioner, when suspecting a Gazan Gaza is Israels free-fire zone].
The interviewer didnt challenge any of that, though he didnt like those pictures are distributed around the world. Israel wants all nations to block the truth.
Murray closed by adding a very brief comment of his own: There is no room to doubt the evil nature of the expansionist apartheid state that Israel has now become. Nor the moral vacuity of its apologists in the western media. Since this was, of course, a damning statement about mainstream news media in The West, these mainstream news media, including Facebook, can be expected to dislike that and they evidently do.
On April 25th Murray headlined "Blocked By Facebook and the Vulnerability of New Media, and he reported:
This sites visitor numbers are currently around one third normal levels, stuck at around 20,000 unique visitors per day. The cause is not hard to find. Normally over half of our visitors arrive via Facebook. These last few days, virtually nothing has come from Facebook:
What is especially pernicious is that Facebook deliberately imposes this censorship in a secretive way. The primary mechanism when a block is imposed by Facebook is that my posts to Facebook are simply not sent into the timelines of the large majority of people who are friends or who follow. I am left to believe the post has been shared with them, but in fact it has only been shown to a tiny number. Then, if you are one of the few recipients and do see the post and share it, it will show to you on your timeline as shared, but in fact the vast majority of your own friends will also not receive it. Facebook is not doing what it is telling you it is doing it shows you it is shared and Facebook is deliberately concealing that fact from you.
Twitter have a similar system known as shadow banning. Again it is secretive and the victim is not informed. I do not appear to be shadow banned at the moment, but there has been an extremely sharp drop by a factor of ten in the impressions my tweets are generating.
I am among those who argue that the strength of the state and corporate media is being increasingly and happily undermined by our ability to communicate via social media. But social media has developed in such a way that the channels of communication are dominated by corporations Facebook, Twitter and Google which can in effect turn off the traffic to a citizen journalism site in a second. The site is not taken down, and the determined person can still navigate directly to it, but the vast bulk of the traffic is cut off. What is more this is done secretly, without your being informed, and in a manner deliberately hard to detect. The ability to simply block the avenues by which people get to see dissenting opinions, is terrifying.
Furthermore neither Facebook nor Twitter contact you when they block traffic to your site to tell you this is happening, let alone tell you why, and let alone give you a chance to counter whatever argument they make. I do not know if I am blocked by Facebook as an alleged Russian bot, or for any other reason. I do know that it appears to have happened shortly after I published the transcript of the Israeli general discussing the procedures for shooting children.
This hidden, never-explained, but clearly systematic, news-suppression, exemplifies the widespread and coordinated operation by the major media, against any independent sites which document things that the Establishment, the aristocracy, the Deep State, or however you call the controlling owners of the corporations that advertise in and own the media, hire their journalists and editors to block from reaching the public. This is a multifaceted but coordinated operation, of censoring-out the key truths, which are those truths that none of the controlling owners want the public to know (such as Craig Murray has now, apparently, done once too often for Facebook to continue allowing). Its how they are enabled to use the government so that it serves them, and not the public-at-large. This is, likewise, the source of the obscene inequality of wealth that results, the vast economic inequality that they all benefit from at the publics expense. Money is power, and they have it. And they use it, against the powerless. Though the controlling owners compete amongst themselves to sell to the public, they all suppress these key truths from reaching the public; because, if they did not, then the wrong politicians would get elected to public offices. Whereas some of the right politicians are Republicans, and some are Democrats, they all serve the same aristocracy, just different sides of it. Because, otherwise, they wouldnt stand even a chance to be elected.
Heres another example of how this works: The CIA is a branch of the U.S. federal government that virtually only serves Americas aristocracy, which is why it lies consciously misrepresents in almost everything it says publicly about international relations, such as it did in 2002, when it asserted that Saddam Hussein still had and still was building weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. government, of which the CIA is a part, used that information to justify invading and occupying a nation (Iraq) which had never invaded nor even threatened to invade the United States. Thats aggression. Theyre doing the same in Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Yemen, etc. Its key truths that are kept hidden from the public. The key truths are the ones that expose and disprove the lies that the Establishment push.
Wikipedia is an example of this. Wikipedia is edited by the CIA, not only in the sense that anyone (including you) can edit what is on Wikipedia, but also in the sense that Wikipedia itself blocks edits or changes that introduce facts and evidence which disprove some of the allegations that are made in Wikipedia articles, and that Wikipedia doesnt tell such a person why a revision or addition to the article was rejected and will not be considered by Wikipedia: the secret people who control the articles, and the secret process by which they do it, are secrets, disclosed to no outsiders, but known to the people who control Wikipedia. The perpetrators know what the key truths are, but the public do not, because the media hide the key truths.
Furthermore, major news media that report things which arent so, are no longer simply burying their after-the-fact corrections so that perhaps only 1% of the people who were deceived by an article get to see that it had been false, but now also by simply refusing to issue any correction at all theyre totally ignoring the readers right not to be deceived by that major news medium. (Most such news media have also terminated or else severely limited their reader- comments section, because otherwise a reader-comment could slip through that disproves the given news article, and the aristocratically controlled medias goal is to block those truths from reaching their audience.)
The Washington Post, which made famous the accusation that non-mainstream newsmedia are fake news, is itself a leader of fake news, and was so during 2002 and early 2003, by stenographically reporting to its readership the George W. Bush administrations falsehoods about Saddams WMD and the rightfulness for America to invade a country (Iraq) that had never invaded nor even threatened to invade the United States. The entire major media, and almost all of the alternative media, are owned or otherwise controlled by the ruling aristocracy and censor out crucial facts which disprove allegations that the government (the ruling aristocracy) wants the public not to know. Above all, they exclude articles like the present one, which (like all articles I do) is being submitted to all of them for publication free-of-charge. So: wherever this article is not published, you know that fake news is published. For example, thats how America now is invading and occupying many countries all on the basis of lying, because none of these nations invaded the United States, ever, and none is invading the United States now; Americas invasions, in recent decades, have all been blatant violations of international law. If the American people knew this, then would we vote for the politicians who tolerate it, and who vote for it? That explains the news media.
And this explains America as the permanent-war-for-permanent-peace champion of the entire world. Of course, if international law were equitably enforced, then every U.S. President in recent decades would be and die in prison. So, obviously, only the few (and none of them are anything close to being mainstream) honest newsmedia will publish this article. You can web-search for this article to find out which ones they are. All the others dont want you to know the truths that this article reports and (via its links) documents.
Is this article alleging a conspiracy? No major corporation exists that doesnt carry out conspiracies, because doing that is essential to their success. The very allegation that conspiracies dont exist amongst the most powerful people and even within and between the most powerful organizations, is ludicrous, but the aristocracy everywhere brainwashes the public everywhere, to think that only the they perpetrate conspiracies, the we dont. They all do; its the way that the world actually works, which is the reason why the aristocracy hide this the most basic fact about the world. They do it in order to block the public from understanding how things actually happen. And they block the public from understanding that no mere mass of people conspires the Jews the Masons, etc. but that only the very few people at the very top can, and do, and that they actually must, in order to remain successful and in power. Its called, and it is, in fact, strategizing. That is what a conspiracy does, anywhere: it develops and executes strategy. To keep the public dumb and misled, the hired propagandists allege the exact opposite.
So: just web-search for this article, and you will see yet more evidence that what it says is true that it is hidden, not published, by all the respectable news-outlets. Like most of the articles I write, it is sent to all of them as a dare and none of them accepts the dare and publishes anything from me. This is one of the ways I know that what I write about the way that the news media work, is true, and that what they say about the way that they work, is false. I am continually testing them, and hoping for one of them to prove me wrong, just one time. It hasnt happened, yet.
Poster Comment:
He is a former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan who went public about CIA black sites and torture. They used to stick a man's arm in boiling oil at 278 degrees F.