Rebekah Roth has, in my opinion, blown the lid off of the lies surrounding the events on 9/11. Facts which are outlined in her recently released book, Methodical Illusion; a book, as of this writing, that is #1 on the Amazon Best Seller List for its category.--NorthWestLibertyNews
Poster Comment:
Roth’s research reveals ALL of the 911 cell phone calls from the passengers to their families and friends were actually made on the ground after the 4 planes landed at a remote military airfield and listen to what her research reveals about passenger 9B. This is a must listen. I agree with NorthWestLibertyNews's opinion that Rebekah has blown the lid off the 9/11 lies.
Wtg, christine. Cyni may well have stroked out on this one.
One can hope! It seems that our super aviator either doesn't know or care that cell phones didn't work on commercial airliners. The last time I tried it was on a flight to christine's, NO SIGNAL ever, and the plane didn't crash, this was part of our discussion on that visit.
It'll take more than facts or science to wake-up that old fool.
Keep in mind that we're also talking about 2001 technology here. While it may not seem that relevant, advances have been enormous.
Exactly! If you could bring a plane down with a cell phone, computer, Ipod, or radio would they really let you take them on the plane, or confiscate them like water bottles and shampoo. Cell phone call circa. 2001- 02 from cruising speed and altitude, I call bullshit.
Exactly! If you could bring a plane down with a cell phone, computer, Ipod, or radio would they really let you take them on the plane, or confiscate them like water bottles and shampoo. Cell phone call circa. 2001- 02 from cruising speed and altitude, I call bullshit.
Rebekah Roth is not a whistle blower. She is a researcher. While very plausible, her hypothesis is just that. It is backed by no references, and she takes forever to get to it.
Her hypothesis is that the planes were commandeered by remote control ("a flight termination system") and landed at nearby airports shortly after takeoff. NORAD and FAA computers were manipulated to show phony flight paths after the jets had actually landed. She calculates that the two jets that left Boston landed at Westover Air Base near Springfield MA. The passengers were told they were participating in a drill and asked to make scripted cell phone calls. One handler is even overheard saying "You did great!" on an answering machine recording. Then the passengers were murdered in cold blood.
After wading through 300 pages of the author walking her dog on Puget Sound and a lame romantic plot, there are some worthwhile scraps. For example, apparently ten of the hijackers are still alive. Mohammed Atta's father said his son worked for Mossad and called him Sept. 12. There are no Arab names on the original passenger manifests; no security camera images; no passenger stubs.
None of the above constitutes "solving 9-11." Roth has a notion that dummy planes were flown into the Trade Center towers. I don't believe any planes crashed into the WTC or the Pentagon. The filmmakers and "eye witnesses" were CIA plants and the planes were dubbed in later. She has nothing about the complicity of the US political elite, media, CIA or military on 9-11.
Roth describes the villains as "the Octopus," Israel and its enablers, consisting of traitors in US government, media and society. Her heroine and a friend alert the President, "Joel Sherman" of an Israeli plot to set off nuclear bombs in US cities and sow deadly viruses. This will be blamed on Iran and result in war. - See more at: henrymakow.com/#sthash.q4rTIMvu.dpuf
I have to ask; isn't Rebekah (the OT spelling of Rebecca) Roth a name one associates with a Jew deli in lower Manhattan? Do we know anything about her CV? Her YouTube channel has the Stanford University logo in the left hand corner of the face page. Is she a graduate?
Near 20,000 body parts were gathered within the Pentagon, all but 200 were identified by DNA or visual means.
I often wonder how the CIA got the Pentagon workers to disappear voluntarily?
If you notice the men getting off the bus in the following video (at about the 43 sec mark), carrying large dark duffel bags, they are most likely the ones who peppered the Pentagon lawn with "debris" and "body parts".
Could you please point me to ANY images of the cockpit, tail section, seats, luggage, or anything else that would be consistent with an airliner flying into a solid object?
Could you please point me to ANY images of the cockpit, tail section, seats, luggage, or anything else that would be consistent with an airliner flying into a solid object?
You do realize that your question is the answer?
BTW, on the North Side of 1 Liberty Plaza on Cortland Street, there was some skin from the outside of the plane that had hit the North Tower, some seat cushions and some life preservers and air masks strewn along the street. I remember thinking, "Wow...I should take some of these as souvenirs!" and then being immediately repulsed by the thought.
Planes are made of and transport materials that essentially disintegrate on impact...
Well Google "aircraft crashes' and view the images, you can see they don't vaporize or disintegrate on impact.
So IF hypothetically there is SO much force and energy in an event to totally vaporize several tons of metal, where the wings of the aircraft don't even blow up as they hit a concrete wall, they simply vanish like they were beamed up from the Star Ship Enterprise, why would remnants of human bodies not disappear as well in your opinion?
When a solid object directly and head on impacts a solid object there's not going to be much left...
It's apparent you've never studied physics. What you said is false.
There's elastic and inelastic collisions. An example of an elastic collision is one where an object such as a baseball is impacted by a bat. The ball travels away from the point of impact and kinetic energy is conserved by way of the ball travelling through the air after being struck by the bat.
An inelastic collision is one where kinetic energy is not conserved and the objects stick together, such as a plane crashing into the ground.
The mass of the objects do not "disappear" just because they hit with high energy unless you're talking about something which can effectively turn to dust and dissipate. No aircraft will simply turn to dust, and its mass will remain after the collision, perhaps in many pieces, but it will ALL remain.
What it comes down to war is that the tale of 9/11 as spun by the media and the government is physically impossible, besides being absolutely nonsensical and requires ignoring actual observed events to be even remotely believable to the non-scientifically minded common folk.
Then again, why would our government want to start a WAR for no reason, right? And why would they allow guilty banksters to not only walk on criminal charges, but bail them out with TRILLIONS of tax payer dollars?
And how could they simply forget that the DOD couldn't account for 2.3 TRILLION dollars, as reported the day prior to 9/11/2001?